Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Corrected links that should have been relative instead of absolute.

Final recommendation: Distributed Software Life Cycle Recommendation-5.docx

7/29 Meeting

Distributed Software Lifecycle Process Models

8/2 Brainstorm

IS&T Service Portfolio Data Dictionary (Glossary of Terms)
9/13 Meeting

Distributed Software Lifecyle Meeting Agenda 9-13-2011.docx

Feasibility Process.docx

The full list of process maps can be found here: Distributed Software Lifecycle Process Models1.   

  • Review Definitions:

...

  • IS&T Service Portfolio Data Dictionary (Glossary of Terms)
  • Subprocesses
  • Short Term

      ...

        • New software request prioritization

      ...

        • What are decision criteria for adding new software

          ...

              • ROI to Community

          ...

              • Business Need

          ...

              • Educational need

          ...

              • Financial Gain

              ...

                    • Time

              ...

                    • Buying Power

              ...

                  • Support burden/Cost

              ...

                  • Does it support mission of MIT

              ...

              • Long Term

                  ...

                    • RACI matrix

                  ...

                    • Service Portfolio

                  ...

                    • Cost Models

                  ...

                    • Map “Feasibility Lite” process

                  ...

                    • Map “Acquisition Lite” process

                  ...

                    • OLA Creation (VSLS/HS)

                  ...

                  • Out of Scope (for this project)

                      ...

                        • Requirements Gathering (PMBA)

                      ...

                        • Request fulfillment triage

                      ...

                        • Support process improvements (HD/DITR)

                      ...

                        • \
                      • Discussion

                          ...

                            • Who “owns” these processes (Feasibility, Acquisition, etc.)

                              ...

                                  • 1 AD

                              ...

                                  • Cross directorate team to do the day-to-day work

                              ...

                                • What authority do they need?

                              ...

                                • What resources do they need?

                                  ...

                                      • Visibility into spending/costs

                                  ...

                                      • Time to do the work

                                  ...

                                    • SW Portfolio to track costs/spending

                                  ...

                                  • Review recommendation structure

                                      ...

                                        • Overview/Problem Statement

                                      ...

                                        • Who “owns” it

                                      ...

                                        • Process Maps

                                      ...

                                      • Next Steps
                                        • Pat and Chris will draft recommendation for group to review
                                        • target date for review 9/30-10/3