You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

MIT Libraries DOME Collections Ur-Core Metadata Element Set


Team members:

Ann Whiteside

Jolene Deverges

Tom Rosko

Liz Andrews

Jolene DeVerges

Selina Wang

Robert Wolfe

Nina Davis-Mills

Beverly Turner

Carl Jones

Ur-Core Element Set

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 

Purpose of these elements is to share metadata between systems and to provide access to these resources by the general public.

Element Name

Examples we thought of

Element Description

 

Title (What)

 

 

 

Name (Who)

Corporate, Personal, Creator, Contributor, Role

 

 

Location (Where)

Repository Location, Location Created, Location Depicted

 

 

Date (When)

Date created, Date depicted, Date Event,

 

 

Type

Genre, Medium, Format, (Image, Text, Audio, Video, Data)

 

 

Rights

Copyright, Usage rights

 

 

Notes (question)

 

 

 

Identifier (What)

 

 

 

Not Quite Ur-Core

 

 

 

Relation

Collection, Components, Items in Other Collections

 

 

Language

 

 

 


DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 

------------

Disc notes 2009-04-29

What labels to use for these elements?  Tom mentioned using DC

What kinds of metadata? Descriptive, Administrative.  Not Preservation

Selina -- Can we focus on one or the other first?

What are the kinds?

Descriptive

     Description

     Subject Analysis

Administrative

     Structural Metadata

     Technical

     Provenance

     (Metametadata)

     Rights

Preservation [Technical, Provenance, Rights]

Tom -- Can we point to a purpose for each element? Rob -- Use cases for each element would be good.

Isn't DC the Ur-core?

 Nina -- What is the stripped down set of elements that belong in each record.

 Rob -- DC is put forth as a common language for sharing metadata.  We may decide the DC is how we will express and share metadata, but we need to choose our own elements.

------------

This page has been created to capture the discussion and recommendations of the DOME Advisory Committee Metadata Strikeforce as they attempt to reach consensus regarding the design of metadata structures in DOME.

Topics of discussion include:

Data Models (Both Content Models and Information Models)

Property Semantics

Value Syntax

Application of Metadata Standards (Element Sets, Serializations, Cataloging Standards)

Metadata Mappings

  • No labels