You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Photo by Cheresa D. Theiral, courtesy U.S. Army.

Part A

Suppose that a rope bridge is constructed using a massless rope that does not stretch. Suppose further that a person is clipped to the rope by a carabiner, with all of their weight essentially supported at one point. Finally, suppose that the rope bridge is to be strung between anchor points that are separated by a horizontal distance of 12.0 m, and that the sag in the bridge when the person is at the midpoint is 1.20 meters. If the person is at rest at the midpoint, what is the ratio of the tension in the rope to the person's weight?

Solution

System: Person as point particle.

Interactions: External influences from the earth (gravity) and the rope (tension).

Model: Point Particle Dynamics.

Approach: We begin with a picture of the situation:

Note that at the midpoint, the rope will be symmetric. Thus, the angles on each side will be the same.

We next construct a free body diagram for the person:

Note that tension appears twice. Again, the symmetry dictates that the tension on each side be the same.

The person is at rest, so their acceleration is zero in both the x and y directions. The x-direction equation is clearly satisfied since we have assumed that the tension and rope angles on each side of the person are the same. Newton's 2nd Law for the y direction gives:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ 2T\sin\theta - mg = 0 ]\end

which is solved to give:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \frac

Unknown macro: {T}
Unknown macro: {mg}

= \frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2sintheta}

] \end

The angle θ is determined by the length of the bridge and the amount of sag in the rope:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \theta = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac

Unknown macro: {h}
Unknown macro: {L/2}

\right) ] \end

Thus:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \sin\theta = \frac

Unknown macro: {h}

{\sqrt{h^

Unknown macro: {2}

+(L/2)^

}}]\end

and:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \frac

Unknown macro: {T}
Unknown macro: {mg}

= \frac{\sqrt{h^

Unknown macro: {2}

+(L/2)^

}}

Unknown macro: {2h}

= 2.55 ]\end

For a 180 lb person, this would correspond to a tension of about 460 lbs. Note that to achieve less sag, more tension must be provided.


Part B

Consider the same rope bridge. If the person is at rest exactly 1/6 of the way along the bridge (as measured horizontally) what is the tension in each side of the rope in terms of the person's weight? Assume that the length of the rope is constant.

Solution

System, Interactions and Model: As in Part A.

Approach: The new picture is:

which gives the free-body diagram:

Note that now we do not have symmetry about the location of the person and so both the angles and the tensions can be different on the two sides.

The equations of Newton's Law give:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ T_

Unknown macro: {1}

\cos\theta_

- T_

Unknown macro: {2}

\cos\theta_

= 0 ]
[ T_

Unknown macro: {1}

\sin\theta_

+ T_

Unknown macro: {2}

\sin\theta_

- mg = 0]\end

These equations cannot be solved without further information. The extra information is the length of the rope. We know from Part A that the rope's length is:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ 2\sqrt{h_

Unknown macro: {A}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (L/2)^{2}} = \mbox

Unknown macro: {12.2 m}

]\end

We can also write the length of the rope in terms of the sag of the rope at the 1/6 L point:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \mbox

Unknown macro: {12.2 m}

= \sqrt{h_

Unknown macro: {B}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (L/6)^{2}} + \sqrt{h_

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (5L/6)^{2}} ]\end

which can be solved to give:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ h_

Unknown macro: {B}

= \mbox

Unknown macro: {0.83 m}

]\end

Once hB is known, the equations of Newton's 2nd Law become:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ T_

Unknown macro: {1}

\frac

Unknown macro: {L/6}

{\sqrt{h_

Unknown macro: {B}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (L/6)^

}} - T_

Unknown macro: {2}

\frac

Unknown macro: {5L/6}

{\sqrt{h_

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (5L/6)^

}} = 0][ T_

\frac{h_{B}}{\sqrt{h_

Unknown macro: {B}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (L/6)^

}} + T_

Unknown macro: {2}

\frac{h_{B}}{\sqrt{h_

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (5L/6)^

}} - mg = 0]\end

Eliminating T2 then gives:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \frac{T_{1}}

Unknown macro: {mg}

= \frac{5\sqrt{h_

Unknown macro: {B}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (L/6)^

}}{6h_{B}} = 2.17 ]\end

and solving for T2 gives:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \frac{T_{2}}

Unknown macro: {mg}

= \frac{\sqrt{h_

Unknown macro: {B}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ (5L/6)^

}}{6h_{B}}= 2.01 ]\end

These results are messy, and so it pays to put the answers back into the equations of Newton's 2nd Law to check them.

  • No labels