You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 94 Next »

Description: 

In this experiment, we are aiming to test whether or not our receptor proteins localize to the cell membrane. To do that, we will have HEK293 cells express LilrB2 and PirB. We will test for membrane localization of the receptors through immunofluorescence. We will use primary antibodies that will bind to LilrB2 and and PirB and secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores that will bind to the primary antibodies. 

Cloning

STATUS: COMPLETE

Description:

Making pEXPRs hEF1a:LilrB2 and hEF1a:PirB.

 

Status:
    • First and second set of liquid cultures didn't grow, possibly because:
      • Too much media
      • Plates were old, antibiotic possibly not working
  • First set of plates didn't have any blue colonies
  • Second set of plates grew blue and white colonies
    • PirB didn't grow any white colonies
    • Colonies picked for LilrB2
      • Liquid culture grew
      • Miniprepped - Product to be verified
  • Golden Gate repeated
    • cells transformed and plated
    • +ve control didn't grow
      • LilrB2 grew blue and white colonies
      • PirB grew white colonies
    • Both liquid cultures grew
    • Miniprepped - Product to be verified
    • pENTRs sent for sequencing - waiting on results 
      • LilrB2 pENTR is correct 
      • PirB pENTR not correct - Q-Q ligation, pENTR only has C terminus end of PirB 
    • New PirB pENTR colonies picked, grown and miniprepped 
      • Restriction digest ran - correct band pattern for one of the colonies
      • Correct colony sent out for sequencing - pENTR has correct sequence
  • LRs with pENTRs made 
    • Restriction digest and gel ran to verify LR products 
      • LilrB2 gave inconclusive results 
        • possible incomplete digestion
      • PirB results did not match expected band pattern 
        • Due to incorrect pENTR 
    • LilrB2 pEXPR sent out for sequencing 
      •  incomplete sequencing results 
      • LilrB2 insert is in the pEXPR
  • LR with new PirB pENTR made 
    • Restriction digest and gel ran to verify LR products 
      • PirB insert is in the pEXPR
Plan:
  • Order LilrB2 and PirB gBlocks 
  • Simulate Golden Gate on Geneious and make sure it works 
  • Golden Gate gBlocks into ggDONR
  • Transform bacteria with Golden Gate product and plate 
  • Pick colonies and grow in liquid culture
  • Miniprep cells and verify product 
  • Make glycerol stocks
  • LR into pDEST
  • Transform, pick colonies and grow in liquid culture
  • Miniprep cells and verify product
  • Make glycerol stocks 
  • Midiprep product

Experiment

Protocols:

Immunostaining for flow cytometry

Immunostaining for microscopy

Antibody
Type
Conjugation
Dilution Used
Link
Anti-LilrB2Mouse monoclonal 

Cytometry: 1/2000

Immunofluorescence: 1/2000

http://www.abcam.com/lilrb2-antibody-ab172538.html
Anti-PirBGoat polyclonal 

Cytometry: 1/2000

Immunofluorescence: 1/2000

http://www.scbt.com/datasheet-9609-Pirb-c-19-antibody.html

Donkey Anti-Goat IgG

 Alexa Fluor 488

Cytometry: 1/2000

Immunofluorescence: 1/200 - 1/1000.

 
Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG 

Alexa Fluor 488

Cytometry: 1/2000

Immunofluorescence: 1/200 - 1/1000.

 

 

LilrB2

TRIAL 1

Well 1

B Cells

Well 2

HEK 293

 

 

 

Permeabilized

(Unstained)

Well 3

 HEK293


 

 

Permeabilized

Well 4

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 5

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:LilrB2 (500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 6
Well 7

B Cells

Well 8

HEK 293

 

 

 

Permeabilized

(Unstained)

Well 9

 HEK293

 

 

 

Permeabilized

Well 10

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 11

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:LilrB2 (500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 12

 

Well 13

B Cells

Well 14

HEK 293

 

 

 

Non-Permeabilized

(Unstained)

Well 15

 HEK293

 

 

 

Non-Permeabilized

Well 16

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Non-Permeabilized

Well 17

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:LilrB2 (500ng)

Non-Permeabilized

Well 18
Well 19

B Cells

Well 20

HEK 293

 

 

 

Non-Permeabilized

(Unstained)

Well 21

 HEK293

 

 

 

Non-Permeabilized

Well 22

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Non-Permeabilized

Well 23

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:LilrB2 (500ng)

Non-Permeabilized

Well 24
Well 1

B Cells

Well 2

HEK 293

 

 

 

Well 3

 HEK293

 

Well 4

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

Well 5

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:LilrB2 (500ng)

Well 6
Well 7

B Cells

Well 8

HEK 293

 

 

Well 9

 HEK293

 

 

Well 10

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

Well 11

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:LilrB2 (500ng)

Well 12

 


TRIAL 2

Well 1

HEK293

(Unstained)

Well 2

HEK293

(Stained)

Well 3

HEK293

hEF1a:LilrB2

(Stained)

Well 4

HEK293

(Unstained)

Well 5

HEK293

(Stained)

Well 6

HEK293

hEF1a:LilrB2

(Stained)

Well 7
Well 8
Well 9
Well 10
Well 11
Well 12
Well 13
Well 14
Well 15
Well 16
Well 17
Well 18
Well 19
Well 20
Well 21
Well 22
Well 23
Well 24

Results:

Microscopy

PermeabilizedNon-permeabilizedNon-permeabilized stained control 
 


Cytometry

Tube 2Tube 3Tube 4Tube 5
  
Tube 8Tube 9Tube 10Tube 11

Overlay of 4 and 5:

hef1a:mKate + dummy hef1a:mKate + hef1a:LilrB2  
+=

 

 

PirB

TRIAL 1

Well 1

B Cells

Well 2

HEK 293

 

 

 

Permeabilized

Well 3

 HEK293

+ Dummy

(1000ng)

 

Permeabilized

Well 4

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 5

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:PirB (500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 6
Well 7

B Cells

Well 8

HEK 293

 

 

 

Permeabilized

Well 9

 HEK293

+ Dummy

(1000ng)

 

Permeabilized

Well 10

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 11

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:PirB (500ng)

Permeabilized

Well 12
Well 13

B Cells

Well 14

HEK 293

 

 

 

Non-Permeabilized

Well 15

 HEK293

+ Dummy

(1000ng)

 

Non-Permeabilized

Well 16

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Non- Permeabilized

Well 17

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:PirB (500ng)

Non-Permeabilized

Well 18
Well 19

B Cells

Well 20

HEK 293

 

 

 

Non-Permeabilized

Well 21

 HEK293

+ Dummy

(1000ng)

 

Non-Permeabilized

Well 22

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate

(500ng)

Non- Permeabilized

Well 23

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:PirB (500ng)

Non-Permeabilized

Well 24
Well 1

B Cells

Well 2

HEK 293

Well 3

 HEK293

+ Dummy (1000ng)

 

Well 4

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

Well 5

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:PirB (500ng)

Well 6
Well 7

B Cells

Well 8

HEK 293

Well 9

 HEK293

+ Dummy (1000ng)

 

Well 10

 HEK293

+ Dummy (500ng)

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

Well 11

HEK293

+ hEF1a:mKate (500ng)

+ hEF1a:PirB (500ng)

Well 12

 


TRIAL 2

Well 1

HEK293

(Unstained)

Well 2

HEK293

(Stained)

Well 3

HEK293

hEF1a:PirB

(Stained)

Well 4

HEK293

(Unstained)

Well 5

HEK293

(Stained)

Well 6

HEK293

hEF1a:PirB

(Stained)

Well 7
Well 8
Well 9
Well 10
Well 11
Well 12
Well 13
Well 14
Well 15
Well 16
Well 17
Well 18
Well 19
Well 20
Well 21
Well 22
Well 23
Well 24

 

In this experiment, we're transfecting the receptor fused to YFP to try get some conclusive results as to whether or not the receptor is localizing to the membrane (since the immunostaining didn't give us any results - or rather gave us weird results)

 

Well 1

HEK293

 

Well 2

HEK293

hEF1a:mKate

Dummy

Well 3

HEK293

hEF1a:PirB-YFP

Dummy

Well 4

HEK293

hEF1a: mKate

hEF1a:PirB-YFP

Well 5

 

Well 6

 

Well 7

HEK293

 

Well 8

HEK293

hEF1a:mKate

Dummy

Well 9

HEK293

hEF1a:PirB-YFP

Dummy

Well 10

HEK293

hEF1a: mKate

hEF1a:PirB-YFP

Well 11
Well 12
Well 13
Well 14
Well 15
Well 16
Well 17
Well 18
Well 19
Well 20
Well 21
Well 22
Well 23
Well 24


Results:

Microscopy

ControlPermeabilizedNon-permeabilizedLilrB2 Paper

Cytometry

SSC-A vs FSC-AFSC-H vs FSC-WSSC-H vs SSC-WYellow vs Red
Tube 1Tube 2Tube 3Tube 4
Tube 5Tube 6Tube 7Tube 8

Analysis: 

Cytometry..

LilrB2 and PirB Trial 1: The plots for the mkate only and mkate + receptor cell populations are very similar. This is most probably due to the bleed through of the red channel into the yellow channel (the 'sensitivity' of the PMTs for the yellow channel was increased because the yellow fluorophore was not very bright).

Next steps:

  • We are going to transfect the receptors without using a transfection marker (Trial 2).

Microscopy..

LilrB2 and PirB Trial 1: For both the receptors, there doesn't seem to be any clear localization of the receptors to the membrane. From the punctate appearance of the cells under the confocal, they seem to be significant localization of the receptors in some subcellular cytoplasmic structure. They may be making it to the membrane; however we are unable to discern that just from the images. Interestingly, this cytoplasmic localization seems to be apparent in the non-permeabilized cells which may mean that the fixing protocol is causing some kind of permeabilization in the cells. It may be of significance to note that in the LilrB2 paper (the one we are trying to replicate), they expressed the receptors under CMV (not hEF1a). Depending on the relative strengths of the promoters, the differing levels of expression (probably higher expression through hEF1a) might be causing the staining pattern that we are seeing.

Next steps:

  • Perhaps staining live cells (to skip the fixation step) and hopefully conclude whether or not some of the receptor is making it to the membrane. (We are also going to do the beta amyloid binding experiment despite being unsure whether or not the receptor is making it to the membrane in hopes that it does bind and we can conclude that it is localizing.)
  • Once we get the receptor-fluorescent protein fusions out of cloning, we can express them and look for localization. This will tell us whether or not the staining pattern that we're seeing is due to the protein expression or the staining.
  • Clone the receptors into a different promoter: CMV or a TRE to determine if high expression levels are the problem. Having inducible expression of the receptors may be helpful later on in determining what the optimal level of receptor expression for the system.



 

  • No labels