Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
Expand
titleGating

Image Added

 

Adherent Transfection

 HEK293

hEF1a:rtTA 2ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 2ng

UAS:eYFP 2ng

hEF1a:mKate 2ng

hEF1a:eBFP 2ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 5ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 5ng

UAS:eYFP 5ng

hEF1a:mKate 5ng

hEF1a:eBFP 5ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 10ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 10ng

UAS:eYFP 10ng

hEF1a:mKate 10ng

hEF1a:eBFP 10ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 20ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 20ng

UAS:eYFP 20ng

hEF1a:mKate20ng

hEF1a:eBFP 20ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 50ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 50ng

UAS:eYFP 50ng

hEF1a:mKate 50ng

hEF1a:eBFP 50ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 100ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 100ng

UAS:eYFP 100ng

hEF1a:mKate 100ng

hEF1a:eBFP 100ng


1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 200ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 200ng

UAS:eYFP 200ng

hEF1a:mKate 200ng

hEF1a:eBFP 200ng

 

1000 nm Dox

Image RemovedImage RemovedImage RemovedImage RemovedImage RemovedImage RemovedImage RemovedImage Removed

...

Red

vs.

Blue

Image AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage Added

Yellow

vs.

Blue

Image AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage AddedImage Added

Co-Transfection

Efficiency

0%0%0.053%0.12%0.74%4.33%5.37%3.15%

Red

vs.

Blue

        

Yellow

vs.

Blue

        

Co-Transfection

Efficiency

0%0%0.047%0.29%1.23%5.87%5.62%2.91%

Co-Transfection

Efficiency Average

0%0%0.05%0.205%0.985%5.1%5.945%3.03%

Suspended Transfection

 HEK293

hEF1a:rtTA 2ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 2ng

UAS:eYFP 2ng

hEF1a:mKate 2ng

hEF1a:eBFP 2ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 5ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 5ng

UAS:eYFP 5ng

hEF1a:mKate 5ng

hEF1a:eBFP 5ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 10ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 10ng

UAS:eYFP 10ng

hEF1a:mKate 10ng

hEF1a:eBFP 10ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 20ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 20ng

UAS:eYFP 20ng

hEF1a:mKate20ng

hEF1a:eBFP 20ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 50ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 50ng

UAS:eYFP 50ng

hEF1a:mKate 50ng

hEF1a:eBFP 50ng

 

1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 100ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 100ng

UAS:eYFP 100ng

hEF1a:mKate 100ng

hEF1a:eBFP 100ng


1000 nm Dox

hEF1a:rtTA 200ng

TRE:Gal4VP16 200ng

UAS:eYFP 200ng

hEF1a:mKate 200ng

hEF1a:eBFP 200ng

 

1000 nm Dox

     

Co-Transfection

Efficiency 1

0%0%0.063%0.19%1.07%4.61%3.95%2.3%

Co-Transfection

Efficiency 2

0%0%0.066%0.32%0.94%4.3%4.77%2.23%

Co-Transfection

Efficiency Average

0%0%0.0645%0.255%1.005%4.455%4.36%2.265%
Image Added
x-axis labelng
10
210
325
450
5100
6250
7500
81000

*performed a T-test on data (albeit sketchy T-test, given that there were only 2 duplicates of each condition) --> suspended vs. adherent show no significant difference in co transfection efficiency