h2. Part C
What if we look at the problem from the point of view of energy. How can the energy be conserved in the same way as a horizontal mass on a spring if we have to consider Gravitational [Potential Energy] as well?
h4. Solution
{toggle-cloak:id=sysC} *System:* {cloak:id=sysC} [Simple Harmonic Motion].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=intC} *Interactions:* {cloak:id=intC} The forces due to the compression or extension of the two springs acting as the [restoring force] and the force of [gravity (near-earth)].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=modC} *Model:* {cloak:id=modC} [Simple Harmonic Motion].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=appC} *Approach:*
{cloak:id=appC}
{toggle-cloak:id=diagC} {color:red} *Diagrammatic Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=diagC}
|!Vertical Mass on Spring Dynamic Energy.PNG!|
{cloak:diagC}
{toggle-cloak:id=mathC} {color:red} *Mathematical Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=mathC}
Consider the total energy relative to the spring's neutral position, where it is neither extended nor comprseed. Even for the static situation of Part *A*, then, the system has stored energy, since you have extended the spring. On the other hand, the mass has fallen, and so you have lost some [potential energy] due to gravity. The total energy change is {*}ΔE{~}1{~}{*}:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{1} = \frac{1}{2}ka^{2} -m g a \]\end{large}{latex}
If you now displace the mass downward by a distance *x{~}i{~}* and hold onto it you change the overall energy because you have done work on the system (you've exerted force against the spring over a distance *x{~}i{~}*, and you've also lost gravitational potential energy in moving downwards). The new energy relative to the neutral position is {*}ΔE{~}2{~}{*}
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{1}{2}k(a + x_{i})^{2} - m g (a + x_{i}) \]\end{large}{latex}
From *Part A* we know that *a = mg/k* , so, substituting:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{1}{2}k\left(\frac{mg}{k} + x_{i} \right)^{2} - m g \left(\frac{mg}{k} + x_{i}\right) \]\end{large}{latex}
\\
Expanding this, then consolidating terms yields
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{(mg)^{2}}{2k}+ m g x_{i} + \frac{1}{2} k {x_{i}}^{2} - \frac{(mg)^{2})}{k} - m g x_{i} \]\end{large}{latex}
\\
{latex}\begin{large} \[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{1}{2}k {x_{i}}^{2} - \frac{(mg)^{2}}{2k} \]\end{large}{latex}
\\
Now consider the energy when the mass has rebounded and is at the original location *a*. It is now moving at velocity *v* and the total energy, potential and kinetic, is
{latex}\begin{large} \[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{1}{2}k \left(\frac{mg}{k}\right)^{2} + \frac{1}{2}mv^{2} -mg\left(\frac{mg}{k}\right) \]\end{large}{latex}
or
{latex}\begin{large} \[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{1}{2}mv^{2} - \frac{(mg)^{2}}{2k} \]\end{large}{latex}
Comparing these two equations, we have that, aside from a constant term of * - (mg){^}2{^}/2k* , the [Kinetic Energy] at the "equilibrium" position is simply * (1/2) m v{^}2{^} * and the [Potential Energy] at full extension (aside from that same constant term) is *(1/2) k {x{~}i{~}}{^}2{^}* , so the emergies are, except for this constant offset term, the same as those for a horizontal spring and mass. Choosing the position at which we calculate zero energy properly would completely eliminate this superfluous term. The vertical spring and mass behaves exactly like a horizontal one in both force and energy relationships, despite the presence of [gravity (interaction)].
{cloak:mathC}
{cloak:appC} |