Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • The first would be the house (or building) manager, who would act as an admin. They will need to have a list of task items to be done, and a list of task items they are either currently working on or have completed.  They will be English literate, and be able to use a web or mobile device. 
    • Age:
    • Interview Results:
  • The second type of user would be the residents of the building, who will be able to search for their house manager and submit task items, as well as vote on the tasks they wish to be completed first.  They will be English literate, and be able to use a web or mobile device.  They should be either students or working class men and women.  
    • On campus undergrad student:
      • Age 21:
      • Interview Results:
        • They had a house manager who did not respond to emails, nor did they seem to work on anything, and so students were confused as to what the house manager was actually doing.  Leaves students wondering as to what the housemaster was working on.
    • Off campus grad student:
      • Age: 22
      • Interview Results:
        • The building has a few issues, such as mice, and people smoking, and these issues are usually emailed to the house manager, without much feedback. It would be nice to see if (and how) the issue is being dealt with, or if it is a low priority to the housemasters (and therefore require more petitioning).  

Task Anaysis

Sounds good to me, if I think of anything else to add I'll say it tomorrow at the meeting.  Some of the tasks that I've identified so far, I will try to add some more before tomorrow's meeting

...