Consider first the static case with the mass hanging from the spring and not moving.
Solution
Toggle Cloak
id
sysA
System:
Cloak
id
sysA
.
Toggle Cloak
id
intA
Interactions:
Cloak
id
intA
The forces due to the compression or extension of the two springs acting as the and the force of .
Toggle Cloak
id
modA
Model:
Cloak
id
modA
.
Toggle Cloak
id
appA
Approach:
Cloak
id
appA
Toggle Cloak
id
diagA
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diagA
The mass m is suspended from a perfect spring with force constant k . Attaching the mass stretches the spring a distance a from its equilibrium length. Draw the force diagram and determine what a must be.
Cloak
diagA
diagA
Toggle Cloak
id
mathA
Mathematical Representation
Cloak
id
mathA
We first consider the case of a stationary mass on a vertical spring. Adding the mass causes the spring to extend a distance a beyond its "neutral", unstretched length. After the mass has come to rest, what are the forces?
From the above diagram, we have the force of gravity pulling downwards with Fg = mg and the spring force pulling upwards with force Fs = ka . Since the mass is stationary we must have
Latex
\begin{large}\[ ka - mg = 0 \]\end{large}
we can solve for the displsacement at equilibrium:
Latex
\begin{large}\[ a = \frac{mg}{k} \]\end{large}
Cloak
mathA
mathA
Cloak
appA
appA
Card
label
Part B
Part B
Analyze the forces on the mass as it oscillates up and down and give its equation of motion.
Solution
Toggle Cloak
id
sysB
System:
Cloak
id
sysB
.
Toggle Cloak
id
intB
Interactions:
Cloak
id
intB
The forces due to the compression or extension of the spring acting as the and the force of .
Toggle Cloak
id
modB
Model:
Cloak
id
modB
.
Toggle Cloak
id
appB
Approach:
Cloak
id
appB
Toggle Cloak
id
diagB
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diagB
The mass m is now displaced from its equilibrium position (extended by a distance a) by an additional distance x .
Cloak
diagB
diagB
Toggle Cloak
id
mathB
Mathematical Representation
Cloak
id
mathB
Displacing the mass a distance x downwards results in restoring force from the spring. We calculated the total force on the mass, due to the original extension and this additional extension, as well as by gravity. we obtain the upward force
But we know from the previous section that ka = mg, so the first and last terms will cancel, leaving
Latex
\begin{large}\[ F_{\rm toal} = kx \]\end{large}
just as in the case of a horizontal spring and mass on a frictionless surface (see, for example, the worked example Mass Between Two Springs)The solution for the equation of motion is, as in the case of Simple Harmonic Motion
Latex
\begin{large}\[ x = A sin(\omega t) + B cos(\omega t) \]\end{large}
These are exactly the same angular velocity and coefficients A and B as in the case of the horizontal mass on a spring (in the absence of gravity).
Cloak
mathB
mathB
Cloak
appB
appB
Card
label
Part C
Part C
What if we look at the problem from the point of view of energy. How can the energy be conserved in the same way as a horizontal mass on a spring if we have to consider Gravitational Potential Energy as well?
Solution
Toggle Cloak
id
sysC
System:
Cloak
id
sysC
.
Toggle Cloak
id
intC
Interactions:
Cloak
id
intC
The forces due to the compression or extension of the two springs acting as the and the force of .
Toggle Cloak
id
modC
Model:
Cloak
id
modC
.
Toggle Cloak
id
appC
Approach:
Cloak
id
appC
Toggle Cloak
id
diagC
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diagC
Cloak
diagC
diagC
Toggle Cloak
id
mathC
Mathematical Representation
Cloak
id
mathC
Consider the total energy relative to the spring's neutral position, where it is neither extended nor comprseed. Even for the static situation of Part A, then, the system has stored energy, since you have extended the spring. On the other hand, the mass has fallen, and so you have lost some potential energy due to gravity. The total energy change is ΔE1:
Latex
\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{1} = \frac{1}{2}ka^{2} -m g a \]\end{large}
If you now displace the mass downward by a distance xi and hold onto it you change the overall energy because you have done work on the system (you've exerted force against the spring over a distance xi, and you've also lost gravitational potential energy in moving downwards). The new energy relative to the neutral position is ΔE2
Latex
\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{1}{2}k(a + x_{i})^{2} - m g (a + x_{i}) \]\end{large}
From Part A we know that a = mg/k , so, substituting:
Latex
\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{1}{2}k\left(\frac{mg}{k} + x_{i} \right)^{2} - m g \left(\frac{mg}{k} + x_{i}\right) \]\end{large}
Expanding this, then consolidating terms yields
Latex
\begin{large}\[ \Delta E_{2} = \frac{(mg)^{2}}{2k}+ m g x_{i} + \frac{1}{2} k {x_{i}}^{2} - \frac{(mg)^{2})}{k} - m g x_{i} \]\end{large}
Now consider the energy when the mass has rebounded and is at the original location a. It is now moving at velocity v and the total energy, potential and kinetic, is
Comparing these two equations, we have that, aside from a constant term of * - (mg)2/2k* , the Kinetic Energy at the "equilibrium" position is simply * (1/2) m v2 * and the Potential Energy at full extension (aside from that same constant term) is (1/2) k {xi}2 , so the emergies are, except for this constant offset term, the same as those for a horizontal spring and mass. Choosing the position at which we calculate zero energy properly would completely eliminate this superfluous term. The vertical spring and mass behaves exactly like a horizontal one in both force and energy relationships, despite the presence of gravity (interaction).