...
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a246343.pdf
Geometry Characteristics
Images from the Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development (AGARD).
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a246343.pdf
Design Trends
High Drag Coefficient is produced by...
- Decreasing the porosity, which also produces a less stable parachute and a higher opening force.
- Conical, multi-conical, quarter-spherical canopy shapes.
- Long suspension lines because they increase the inflated diameter.
Images from the Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development (AGARD). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a246343.pdf
S_o = canopy surface area including the vent area and all openings and slots in canopy, ft^2 C_D_o = parachute drag coefficient related to canopy surface area, dimensionless
x_o and x_p are interchangeable in this directory. |
Geometries Compared
This section will cover different parachute designs that are relevant to our use case of the Phoenix drogue. Note: there are many other main types of parachutes that are not included here because their use cases were not appropriate for the Phoenix drogue goal.
Parachute Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ranking for Phoenix | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cross |
|
| 2 | |||
Disk-band-gap | 3 | |||||
Hemisflo Ribbon | ||||||
Conical Ribbon | ||||||
Guide Surface | ||||||
Ringslot | ||||||
|
| 4 | ||||
Conical Ribbon |
| 1 | ||||
Guide Surface |
|
| 6 | |||
Ringslot |
|
| 5 | |||
Ballute |
|
| 7 | Ballute |
Common Problems and Solutions
...