You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

The energy of an object's translational and/or rotational motion.

Page Contents

Motivation for Concept

One way to think of energy is the ability to do harm. Things that are very dangerous possess considerable energy. With that definition in mind, the concept of kinetic energy can be motivated by considering the danger posed by moving objects. When a baseball is thrown by a child, it is not very frightening, though it can break a lamp. When a baseball is thrown by a major league pitcher, they can cause considerable injury. This contrast indicates that the energy of motion will depend on speed. Similarly, although a baseball thrown at 60 mph is dangerous, a car driving 60 mph is deadly. This contrast indicates that the energy of motion will depend upon mass.


Mathematical Definition

Translational Kinetic Energy

The kinetic energy of a point particle is given by:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ K = \frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

mv^

]\end

Kinetic Energy of a System

Since energy is a scalar, the kinetic energy of a system of point particles is the sum of the kinetic energies of the constituents:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ K^

Unknown macro: {rm sys}

= \sum_

Unknown macro: {j = 1}

^

Unknown macro: {N}

\frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

m_

Unknown macro: {j}

v_

^

]\end

where N is the number of system constituents.

Kinetic Energy of a Rigid Body

Consider a rigid body that can rotate and translate. We begin by treating the rigid body as a collection of point masses that are translating with the center of mass of the body and also rotating about it with angular velocity ω. We therefore write the velocity of each point as a sum of rotational and translational parts:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \vec

Unknown macro: {v}

_

Unknown macro: {j}

= \vec

_

Unknown macro: {rm cm}

+ \vec

Unknown macro: {omega}

\times \vec

Unknown macro: {r}

_

Unknown macro: {j}

]\end

where rj is the position of the jth particle measured from the body's axis of rotation passing through the center of mass.

With this split, the kinetic energy of the body becomes:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ K = \sum_

Unknown macro: {j}

\frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

m_

(v_

Unknown macro: {rm cm}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ \vec

Unknown macro: {v}

_

\cdot(\vec

Unknown macro: {omega}

\times \vec

Unknown macro: {r}

_

Unknown macro: {j}

) + \omega^

Unknown macro: {2}

r_

^

Unknown macro: {2}

)]\end

The center term will equal zero, because ω and vcm are constants, so:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \sum_

Unknown macro: {j}

\frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

m_

\vec

Unknown macro: {v}

_

Unknown macro: {rm cm}

\cdot(\vec

Unknown macro: {omega}

\times \vec

Unknown macro: {r}

_

Unknown macro: {j}

) =
\frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

\vec

_

Unknown macro: {rm cm}

\cdot\left(\vec

Unknown macro: {omega}

\times \sum_

Unknown macro: {j}

m_

\vec

Unknown macro: {r}

_

Unknown macro: {j}

\right)]\end

and the sum over mjrj is constrained to equal zero because we have assumed the center of mass is at the position r = 0 in our coordinates. With this realization, and using the definition of the moment of inertia, we have:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ K = \frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

m_

Unknown macro: {rm tot}

v_

Unknown macro: {rm cm}

^

+ \frac

Unknown macro: {2}

I_

Unknown macro: {rm cm}

\omega^

]\end

This result shows that the kinetic energy of a rigid body can be broken into two parts, generally known as the translational part and the rotational part.

Rotational Kinetic Energy

The above formula suggests a definition for the kinetic energy of a rotating body:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ K^

Unknown macro: {rm rot}

= \frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

I\omega^

]\end


Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem

Statement of the Theorem

If all the influences on a point particle are represented as works, the net work done by the forces produces a change in the kinetic energy of the particle according to:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \Delta K = W_

Unknown macro: {rm net}

]\end

Derivation of the Theorem

From Newton's 2nd Law for a point particle, we know

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \vec

Unknown macro: {F}

_

Unknown macro: {rm net}

= m\frac{d\vec{v}}

Unknown macro: {dt}

]\end

Now suppose that the particle undergoes an infinitesimal displacement dr. Since we want to bring the left side of the equation into line with the form of the expression for work, we take the dot product of each side with the displacement:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \vec

Unknown macro: {F}

_

Unknown macro: {rm net}

\cdot d\vec

Unknown macro: {r}

= m\frac{d\vec{v}}

Unknown macro: {dt}

\cdot d\vec

]\end

Before we can integrate, we make a substitution. Since v is the velocity of the particle, we can re-express the infinitesimal displacement as:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ d\vec

Unknown macro: {r}

= \vec

Unknown macro: {v}

dt]\end

Making this substitution on the right hand side of the equation, we have:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \vec

Unknown macro: {F}

_

Unknown macro: {rm net}

\cdot d\vec

Unknown macro: {r}

= m\frac{d\vec{v}}

Unknown macro: {dt}

\cdot \vec

Unknown macro: {v}

\:dt = m\vec

\cdot d\vec

Unknown macro: {v}

]\end

We can now integrate over the path:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \int_

Unknown macro: {rm path}

\vec

Unknown macro: {F}

_

Unknown macro: {rm net}

\cdot d\vec

Unknown macro: {r}

= \frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

m(v_

Unknown macro: {f}

^

-v_

Unknown macro: {i}

^

Unknown macro: {2}

)]\end

which is equivalent to the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem.

  • No labels