You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Feb. 21, 2008

Attendee: Catherine, Robin, Mike Moretti, Jcalz, Qing

things worth saving from Thalia:

level of control on metadata:
1. aspects -- need developer involvement
2. extended metadata --controlled by domain admin
3. metadata mapping -- controlled by domain admin
4. tagging -- user controlled

Configurable metadata aspects (meaning domain admins can assign values for fields)

   - currently Dublin Core

   - extend to other metadata schemas

tagging

containers

   - nested

   - hold content items but do have content 
items

   - a leaf node

   - have content 
grouping  thingy

   - thalia albums, slideshows

   - set of relationships, a view

   - should there be a hierarchy? 
NEW: relationships between items

   - need by OCW

   - varying states in a workflow? 

Who will benefit from ECM:

thalia, stellar, records management and scanned documents (copies of transcripts, registration info),
myfiles application, licensing application

Purpose of the ECM:

1. shield the backend form front end. Shield repository implementation details.
2. reduce programming cost in the future

Goals of the ECM:

get the fundamental concepts right to make the ecm a general purpose tool in MIT

scalable and extensible

model should be strongly typed and api should be fairly concrete

generation of new REST api should require minimum reconfiguration and automated using metadata

api can be implemented on top of alfresco to reduce network delay.

  • No labels