Name / Recording date/time | Priority | Videos | Transcripts | Interviewee Review & Sign off | First Cut | First Cut Notes | Final Version | Final Subtitle/transcription | General Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ian Condry Dec 22,2016 | 1 | Ready to be transcribed |
Ready to be video edited |
|
|
| Ian_Condry_v5.srt |
Consent approved to publish 5/5 | ||
|
|
|
| No longer producing these videos as of 5/12. | ||||||
3. | Amy Smith Jan 5,2017 | snip | Ready to be transcribed | Submitted for video edit 5/12 | ||||||
4. | Travis Franck Jan 11,2017 | 2 | Ready to be transcribed | Submitted for video edit 5/12 | ||||||
5. | David Miller Jan 17,2017 | 1 | Ready to be transcribed |
Ready to be video edited | Sign off requested by interviewee footage and proposed cuts sent 2/8 |
|
| Dropbox Link | David_Miller_v5.srt |
Approved for publishing on 5/8. But also noted the following: However, I worry that some of the cuts may have removed key context and the video may be a bit hard to understand. For example, towards the end, I say “we’re going to accomplish both in spades”, but the part where I had talked about the two things we’re trying to accomplish (impact on climate and having a great investment multiple) was removed. Also, for my background, it cuts from my starting a company to going back to MIT and continuing investing, skipping what happened to the company and how and when I started investing, which, again, I’d imagine can be confusing to a viewer….
There were other parts of the interview that were highlighted in the transcript and I think provided helpful context that weren’t included, but for some of those, I could see there’s a tradeoff between length of the video and providing the context.
Maybe have two versions – the thumbnail, and one with more context?
And I say “umm” way too often! |
Professor Eltahir Jan 25,2017 | 2 | Ready to be transcribed |
Ready to be video edited - but HOLD due to priority | Sign off requested by interviewee footage and proposed cuts sent 2/8 |
BUT we are pausing further production on this one, pending completion of other higher priority videos. |
|
Final: Dropbox link | Elfatih_Eltahir.srt |
Final approved by Eltahir on 5/12. | |
7. | Julie Simpson Jan 25,2017 | 1 | Ready to be transcribed | Markups: Curt, Rajesh | Ready forfirstcut. |
| Dropbox Link | Julie approved final video on 5/17 with consent to post. Submitted to 3play for final transcription and subtitles on 5/17. | ||
8. | Jennifer Ballen | snip | Ready to be transcribed | Transcript 85 | ||||||
9. | Arun Singh | snip | Ready to be transcribed IMG_0117 only! | Transcript 117 | ||||||
10. | Josué Lopez | 1 | Ready to be transcribed | Curt, Rajesh, Dave reviewed, | Sign off requested by interviewee |
| V1:Dropbox Link V2:Dropbox Link V3: Dropbox link | Josue Lopez_v2.srt |
Consent approved to publish 5/5 | |
11. | Dan Tefft | defer | ||||||||
12. | Mark Trexler | defer | ||||||||
13. | Larry Susskind | 2 |
| Dave reviewed - bold font=keep Curt reviewed 3/7 | Sign off requested by interviewee | |||||
14. | Kerry Emanuel | snip | Ready to be transcribed | Transcript 121 | Sign off requested by interviewee | |||||
15 | Valerie Karplus | 2 |
| v2: Dropbox Link (5/9) v3: Dropbox Link (5/11) |
| |||||
16 | Maria Zuber | 1 | Ready to be transcribed | Curt, Rajesh reviewed; Tom Kiley approved | 2nd version ready as of 5/1 | 3/16/17: Jean – the transcripts have been marked up and approved. Ready for the first cut Suggestion for segments (labelled in transcripts): 1. Intro 2. Ethics and Policy Imperatives 3. MIT Climate Action 4. Engagement on Many Levels | V1:Dropbox Link V2:Dropbox Link | Maria_Zuber.srt | Tom Kiley approved the recut | |
17 | Sarah Finnie Robison | snip | Transcript | 3/8 - Rajesh will Postpone |