...
One of the primary concerns with the old ISTAB was that IS&T staff often outnumbered student attendees at many meetings. This was caused by a number of factors, including meeting time and location, meeting frequency, and failure to obtain a critical mass of attendees.
The new ISTAB should have more of a "for students, by students" approach. It must ensure a balance between student government (UA, GSC, DormCon, IFC, PanHel, LGC), SIPB, and the general student body. As such, there should be 4 "at-large" members (2 each of undergrad and grad), who don't represent any specific constituency, yet have an interest in the state of computing at the Institute.
...
Meetings should be held at student-friendly times. At a minimum, this should be after 5:00, and may end up being 7:00 (5-7 is historically reserved for athletics, but a small number of evening classes begin at 7), or possibly a weekend time.
Meetings should occur on a monthly basis, Sept-May, keeping in mind that December and January are difficult months for scheduling due to finals and IAPmore frequently than monthly. Monthly meetings would essentially mean 3-4 per semester, which doesn't really allow time for anything useful. A 3-week schedule would be idealBi-weekly is likely the best choice, keeping in mind the difficulty of scheduling meetings in December, January, and Maythat December and January are difficult months for scheduling due to finals and IAP.
Staff Roles
One IS&T staff member should act as a facilitator, ensuring the discussion stays on topic. Additional IS&T staff members can may be invited to specific meetings to provide guidance on existing policies, identify appropriate channels for requests, etc. There To ensure the Board remains student-centric, there should never be more than 2 regular staff attendees.
...