Comment:
Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
...
Image Added
Shoemaker-Levy
...
Comet
...
Fragment
...
9
...
impacting
...
Jupiter
...
July
...
22
...
1994
...
Photo
...
from
...
Wikimedia
...
Commons
...
by
...
NASA/JPL
Image Added
Jupiter, showing the impact marks from fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in July 1994 Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Original by Hubble Space Telescope Comet Team and NASA
Because gravity (interaction) will act to pull meteors, comets, and other space debris toward a planet, the effective cross-section for a planet to capture an object is larger than its geometrical cross-section. What is the size of this effective cross-section in terms of the physical qualities of the planet and the situation? What features of the impacting body is it independent of?
Solution
Toggle Cloak
id
sys
System:
Cloak
id
sys
subject to but moving with constant .
Toggle Cloak
id
int
Interactions:
Cloak
id
int
.
Toggle Cloak
id
mod
Model:
Cloak
id
mod
Conservation of Energy and Conservation of Angular Momentum.
Toggle Cloak
id
app
Approach:
Cloak
id
app
Toggle Cloak
id
diag
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diag
The initial situation with distances and velocities
Image Added
The Force Diagram of the Meteor approaching the Planet
We can calculate the effective Capture Radius b by setting this as the distance the path of the mass is displaced from one running through the center of the planet for the situation where the mass just touches the surface of the planet at its closest approach. The offset between the path of the object and the center of the planet is usually called the impact parameter, and we are looking for its critical value. Once we have it, we can turn it into a cross-section for capture by squaring it and multiplying by π .
We begin by recognizing that both Energy and Angular Momentum (about the planet's center) are conserved. Some of the object's gravitational Potential Energy is transformed into Kinetic Energy, but none is lost. And since there is no torque when the Angular Momentum is calculated about the center of the planet, the angular momentum must be conserved as well. (Both of these statements would not be true if some nonconservative, dissipative Force was present, but we are assuming motion through empty space, and a fall onto a surface with no atmosphere.)We write the conditions for the initial state (when the mass is very far from the planet) with subscript i and for the final state (when the mass comes down and just grazes the planet tangentially) by the subscript f.
The mass of the meteor is m. That of the planet is M. The initial distance between the center of the planet and the meteor is ri. The final disttance is the radius of the planet, R.
The magnitude of the initial angular momentum is
Latex
\begin{large}\[ L_{i} = mv_{i}b \]\end{large}
The initial Energy is
Latex
\begin{large}\[ E_{\rm total} = KE + PE \]\end{large}
Latex
\begin{large}\[ E_{\rm initial\;total} = \frac{1}{2}m{v_{i}}^{2} - \frac{mMG}{r|
|!636px-Jupiter_showing_SL9_impact_sites.jpg!|
|Jupiter, showing the impact marks from fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in July 1994
Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Original by NASA/JPL|
{composition-setup}{composition-setup}
{excerpt:hidden=true}Calculation of Effective Cross-Section of a planet with Gravity{excerpt}
Because [gravity] will act to pull meteors, comets, and other space debris toward a planet, the effective cross-section for a planet to capture an object is larger than its geometrical cross-section. What is the size of this effective cross-section in terms of the physical qualities of the planet and the situation? What features of the impacting body is it independent of?
h4. Solution
{toggle-cloak:id=sys} *System:* {cloak:id=sys}Flywheel as [rigid body] rotating about a fixed point under constant Torque.{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=int} *Interactions:* {cloak:id=int}The fixed axis keeps the Flywheel from Accelerating. The Externally applied Torque.{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=mod} *Model:* {cloak:id=mod} Rotational Motion and Constant Torque.{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=app} *Approach:*
{cloak:id=app}
{toggle-cloak:id=diag} {color:red} *Diagrammatic Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=diag}
It is important to sketch the situation and to define linear and rotational coordinate axes.
!Accelerating Flywheel 01.PNG!
{cloak:diag}
{toggle-cloak:id=math} {color:red} *Mathematical Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=math}
The force is supplied by a belt around the smaller wheel of radius *r* (in a 19th century factory, it would probably be a circular leather belt attached to the water wheels). This means that the direction the force is applied along is always tangential to the circumference of the wheel, and hence *Torque = r X F = rF*
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \vec{\tau} = \vec{r} X \vec{F} = rF = I_{\rm total} \alpha \]\end{large}{latex}
The Moment of Inertia of combined bodies about the same axis is simply the sum of the individual Moments of Inertia:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ I_{\rm total} = I_{\rm small} + I_{\rm large} \]\end{large}{latex}
The Moment of Inertia of a solid disc of radius *r* and mass *m* about an axis through the center and perpendicular to the plane of the disc is given by:
{latex}
{latex}
So the Moment of Inertia of the complete flywheel is:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ IE_{\rm final\;total} = \frac{1}{2}(m r^2 + M R^2 ) m{v_{f}}^{2} - \frac{mMG}{R} \]\end{large}{latex}
The expression for the angular velocity and the angle as a
Equating the two expressions for angular momentum gives
Latex
\begin{large}\[ mv_{i}b = mv_{f}R \]\end{large}
Latex
function of time (for constant angular acceleration) is given in the *Laws of Change* section on the [Rotational Motion] page:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \omegav_{\rm f} = \frac{b}{R}v_{i} \]\end{large}
Inserting this into the expression for the final Energy, and equating the initial and final energies gives, after some algebra:
Latex
omega_{\rm i} + \alpha (t_{\rm f} - t_{\rm i}) \] \end{large}{latex}
and
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \theta_{\rm f} b = R\theta_sqrt{\rm1i} + \omega_{\rm i} ( t_{\rm f} - t_{\rm i} ) + \frac{1}{2} \alpha ( t_{\rm f} - t_{\rm i} )^2 frac{2MG}{{v_{i}}^{2}}\frac{r_{i}-R}{r_{i}R}} \]\end{large}{latex}
We assume that at the start, *t{~
In the limit as ri goes to infinity, this becomes
Latex
}i{~} = 0* , we have both position and angular velocity equal to zero. The above expressions then simplify to:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \omega_{\rm f}b = R\alpha t_{\rm f}\]\end{large}{latex}
and
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \theta_{\rm f} = \frac{1}{2} \alpha {t_{\rm f}}^2sqrt{1 + \frac{2MG}{R{v_{i}}^{2}}} \]\end{large}{latex}
where
{latex}
Looking either at the value of b or of the Capture Cross Section, we see that it goes toward radius R or area πR2 when the mass M goes to zero, or if G were to magically become zero, or if the initial velocity vi is much larger than MG .
On the other hand, the value of b (and of the Capture Cross Section) increases as the gravitational force of the planet increases (that is, as MG gets larger).
An unexpected result is that the value of b increases if MG remains the same but the value of videcreases. When the initial velocity is zero, b becomes infinite, meaning that the meteor must invariably fall into the planet.
(Of course, this result assumes a universe consisting solely of a motionless meteor and a motionless planet, and nothing else. As soon as we add other masses, or any relative velocity, the result is different.)
Finally, note that the end result is completely independent of the mass of the meteor m . The Capture Cross-Section is the same for any mass falling into the planet at initial velocity vi .