Comment:
Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
...
Deck of Cards
id
bigdeck
Card
label
Part A
Wiki Markup
h3.
Part
A
|!parachute_accelerate.jpg!|
|Photo by Cpl. Sean Capogreco courtesy
A
Image Added
Photo by Cpl. Sean Capogreco courtesy U.S.
Army
|
In
the
photo
above,
Sgt.
1st
Class
Cheryl
Stearns
of
the
U.S.
Army's
Golden
Knights
parachute
team
demonstrates
how
to
maximize
acceleration
during
a
skydive.
Suppose
that
a
75
kg
skydiver
was
using
this
technique.
If
the
skydiver's
current
acceleration
is
2.0
m/s
{^}
2
{^}
toward
the
ground,
what
is
the
force
of
air
resistance
acting
on
the
skydiver?
h4. Solution
{
Solution
Toggle Cloak
:
id
=
sysa
} *
System:
Cloak
id
sysa
The skydiver will be treated as a .
Toggle Cloak
id
inta
Interactions:
Cloak
id
inta
External influences from the earth (gravity) and the air.
Toggle Cloak
id
moda
Model:
Cloak
id
moda
.
Toggle Cloak
id
appa
Approach:
Cloak
id
appa
Toggle Cloak
id
diaga
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diaga
The free body diagram for this situation is:
Image Added
Note
When drawing a free body diagram for an object moving vertically under the influence of gravity and some other force(s), it is important to try to decide whether gravity is "winning" over the other force(s) or not. In this case, we know that the skydiver is accelerating toward the ground, so we expect that the force of gravity is larger than the force of air resistance. If you can come to such a conclusion, it is a good idea to represent it in your free body diagram.
Cloak
diaga
diaga
Toggle Cloak
id
matha
Mathematical Representation
Cloak
id
matha
The x-direction is unimportant in this problem, so we write only the y-component equation of Newton's Second Law:
Latex
* {cloak:id=sysa}The skydiver will be treated as a [point particle].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=inta} *Interactions:* {cloak:id=inta}External influences from the earth (gravity) and the air.{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=moda} *Model:* {cloak:id=moda}[Point Particle Dynamics].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=appa} *Approach:*
{cloak:id=appa}
{toggle-cloak:id=diaga} {color:red} *Diagrammatic Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=diaga}
The free body diagram for this situation is:
!skydiver_accelerateFBD.jpg!
{note}When drawing a free body diagram for an object moving vertically under the influence of gravity and some other force(s), it is important to try to decide whether gravity is "winning" over the other force(s) or not. In this case, we know that the skydiver is accelerating toward the ground, so we expect that the force of gravity is larger than the force of air resistance. If you can come to such a conclusion, it is a good idea to represent it in your free body diagram.{note}
{cloak:diaga}
{toggle-cloak:id=matha} {color:red} *Mathematical Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=matha}
The x-direction is unimportant in this problem, so we write only the y-component equation of Newton's Second Law:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \sum F_{y} = F_{\rm air} - mg = ma_{y} \] \end{large}{latex}
This
equation
has
only
one
unknown,
so
we
can
solve
for
_
Fair.
Latex
_~air~.
{latex}\begin{large}\[ F_{\rm air} = mg+ma_{y} = 735\:{\rm N} + (75\:{\rm kg})(-2.0\:{\rm m/s}^{2}) = 590\:{\rm N}\] \end{large}{latex}
{warning}This problem illustrates the importance of choosing a coordinate system. Only by explicitly choosing the y-direction (as we did in the free body diagram) will you remind yourself that the acceleration is downward, and so an appropriate sign must be applied. In our case, because we chose the positive y-direction to be upward, the acceleration must be negative.{warning}
{tip}As we predicted in the note above, the force of air resistance is smaller than the force of gravity on the skydiver in this case.{tip}
{cloak:matha}
{cloak:appa}
Warning
This problem illustrates the importance of choosing a coordinate system. Only by explicitly choosing the y-direction (as we did in the free body diagram) will you remind yourself that the acceleration is downward, and so an appropriate sign must be applied. In our case, because we chose the positive y-direction to be upward, the acceleration must be negative.
Tip
As we predicted in the note above, the force of air resistance is smaller than the force of gravity on the skydiver in this case.
Cloak
matha
matha
Cloak
appa
appa
Card
label
Part B
Wiki Markup
h3.
Part
B
|!parachute_terminal.jpg|width=700!|
|Photo by Shane Hollar courtesy
Once again, we can use cues from the problem to decide whether gravity is "winning" over the other force(s) or not. In this case, we know that the skydiver is moving at constant speed, so we expect that the force of gravity is precisely balanced by the force of air resistance.
Cloak
diagb
diagb
Toggle Cloak
id
mathb
Mathematical Representation
Cloak
id
mathb
The x-direction is unimportant in this problem, so we write only the y-component equation of Newton's Second Law:
Latex
=diagb} {color:red} *Diagrammatic Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=diagb}
The free body diagram for this situation is:
!skydiver_terminalFBD.jpg!
{note}Once again, we can use cues from the problem to decide whether gravity is "winning" over the other force(s) or not. In this case, we know that the skydiver is moving at constant speed, so we expect that the force of gravity is precisely balanced by the force of air resistance.{note}
{cloak:diagb}
{toggle-cloak:id=mathb} {color:red} *Mathematical Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=mathb}
The x-direction is unimportant in this problem, so we write only the y-component equation of Newton's Second Law:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \sum F_{y} = F_{\rm air} - mg = ma_{y} \] \end{large}{latex}
Now,
since
the
problem
tells
us
the
skydiver
is
falling
with
a
constant
velocity,
we
know
that
the
y-accleration
is
zero.
Cancelling
the
_
ma
_~_
y
_~
term,
we
can
solve
for
_
Fair:
Latex
_~air~:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ F_{\rm air} = mg = 740\:{\rm N}\] \end{large}{latex}
{note}The speed of the skydiver is irrelevant to this problem. As long as the acceleration is zero, the forces balance.{note}
{cloak:mathb}
{cloak:appb}
Note
The speed of the skydiver is irrelevant to this problem. As long as the acceleration is zero, the forces balance.
Cloak
mathb
mathb
Cloak
appb
appb
Card
label
Part C
unmigrated-wiki-markup
h3.
Part
C
|!parachute_decel.jpg|width=700!|
|Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Christopher Stephens courtesy
C
Image Added
Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Christopher Stephens courtesy U.S.
Navy.
|
Immediately
after
opening
the
parachute,
the
skydiver
will
begin
to
decelerate.
The
parachute
has
effectively
increased
the
skydiver's
air
resistance,
which
lowers
the
terminal
velocity.
Suppose
that
a
75
kg
skydiver
has
recently
pulled
the
rip
cord
and
is
currently
decelerating
at
2.0
m/s
{^}
2
{^}
.
What
is
the
force
of
air
resistance
acting
on
the
skydiver
(including
parachute)?
h4. Solution
{
Solution
Toggle Cloak
:
id
=
sysc
} *
System:
Cloak
id
sysc
The skydiver and parachute will be treated as a single.
Toggle Cloak
id
intc
Interactions:
Cloak
id
intc
External influences from the earth (gravity) and the air.
Toggle Cloak
id
modc
Model:
Cloak
id
modc
.
Toggle Cloak
id
appc
Approach:
Cloak
id
appc
Toggle Cloak
id
diagc
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diagc
The free body diagram for this situation is:
Image Added
Note
Again, we try to decide whether gravity is "winning" over the other force(s) or not. In this case, we know that the skydiver's deceleration is equivalent to an upward acceleration. Thus, we expect that the (downward) force of gravity is less than the (upward) force of air resistance in this case.
Cloak
diagc
diagc
Toggle Cloak
id
mathc
Mathematical Representation
Cloak
id
mathc
The x-direction is unimportant in this problem, so we write only the y-component equation of Newton's Second Law:
Latex
* {cloak:id=sysc}The skydiver and parachute will be treated as a _single_ [point particle].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=intc} *Interactions:* {cloak:id=intc}External influences from the earth (gravity) and the air.{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=modc} *Model:* {cloak:id=modc}[Point Particle Dynamics].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=appc} *Approach:*
{cloak:id=appc}
{toggle-cloak:id=diagc} {color:red} *Diagrammatic Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=diagc}
The free body diagram for this situation is:
!skydiver_decelFBD.jpg!
{note}Again, we try to decide whether gravity is "winning" over the other force(s) or not. In this case, we know that the skydiver's deceleration is equivalent to an _upward_ acceleration. Thus, we expect that the (downward) force of gravity is less than the (upward) force of air resistance in this case.{note}
{cloak:diagc}
{toggle-cloak:id=mathc} {color:red} *Mathematical Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=mathc}
The x-direction is unimportant in this problem, so we write only the y-component equation of Newton's Second Law:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ \sum F_{y} = F_{\rm air} - mg = ma_{y} \] \end{large}{latex}
{warning}
{tip}As we predicted in the note above, the force of air resistance is larger than the force of gravity on the skydiver in this case.{tip}
{cloak:mathc}
{cloak:appc}
Tip
As we predicted in the note above, the force of air resistance is larger than the force of gravity on the skydiver in this case.