...
The following documents were used as sources of information for this test plan:
- Questcon Technologies, The Questcon Test Management Methodology; 01/07/2005; (Test Management Methodology Release 4.0.doc).
- ISDA IdM Collaboration Accounts-Use Cases
2.0 Introduction
2.1 Purpose
...
- CAMS Use Cases (IdPe)
- Self-initiated account creation
- sending activation code via e-mail
- Self-initiated account creation
- password strength validation.
- Self service password reset
- User may set or modify full name information
- Users that specify an MIT email address will have their MIT ID number automatically associated with the CAMS account
- Self service password reset
- User may register an OpenID accountUser may set or modify full name information
- User may associate MIT ID number with account
- Accounts manager password reset
- Accounts manager may associate MIT ID number with account
- User may associate alternate security IDs with the account
- User may associate other email addresses with their account
- Administrators may set the status of alt_security_id types
- OverView of Account Admin
- Account Deactivation
- IdPi Use Cases
- TBD
- Username/password
- Cookies enabled/disabled
- Javascript enabled/disabled
- Kerberos
- Cookies enabled/disabled
- Javascript enabled/disabled
- With and without valid tickets
- X.509 User Certificates
- Cookies enabled/disabled
- Javascript enabled/disabled
- with and without valid certificate installed
- Preference for authentication method via cookie
- Open issue - variety of browsers supported (question mostly about mobile support)
** Currently there are 17 ** Currently there are 17 total use cases identified for CAMS and none for the IdPi. This document assumes an estimated 50 total use cases for planning purposes.
...
The following modules and types of tests are considered to be outside the scope of immediate test effort. As functionality is added, test cases for this test effort and will not be tested by Questcon. Testing may be performed by internal MIT personnel:functionality will need to be developed. Immediate test planning focus should be on CAMS versions 0.5 and 0.6, continuing to later versions as time progresses.
- CAMS Use Cases (IdPe)
- Sponsored account creation
- Sponsor may review a list of accounts that they have sponsored
- IdPi Use Cases
- TBD
...
Type of Testing | Included | Comments | Team Responsible |
Automation | N | MIT personnel will utilize jMeter to automate portions of the backend testing; no test automation tools will be used for the UI testing (use of Flash prevents this ??). | N/A |
Conversion | N | There is no pre-existing system; therefore no data conversion is necessary. | N/A |
Exploratory | N Y | Some level of exploratory testing will be conducted based on heuristics related to typical rich-content internet applications. | Questcon N/A |
Functional | Y | Functional testing will be performed based on test cases derived on the documented use cases and front-end functional design. | Questcon |
Installation / Upgrade | N | Because this is a web application no installation testing is necessary. | N/A |
Integration | N Y | Some integration testing will naturally occur as the front-end of the Touchstone application interfaces with and utilizes the back-end APIs. | Questcon N/A |
Parallel | N | There is no existing system that Touchstone is replacing. | N/A |
Performance | N | Performance testing is coved by a separate Test Plan. | N/A |
Regression | Y | Questcon expects to run at least a minimum regression test set prior to release to production. | Questcon |
Security | Y | Backend security testing will be done by MIT. Questcon will execute basic security/login testing on the front-end | MIT - Tester (backend) |
UAT | Y | The user community will be tasked with performing ad-hoc user acceptance testing, domain specific metadata testing (metadata titles, tag lists, etc.), as well as previously designated documented functional test cases for multiple browser/OS configurations (primarily Safari or Firefox/Mac configurations). | MIT - User Community |
Unit | Y | Questcon expects the MIT developers to perform unit testing prior to releasing code to the test environment. | MIT - Developers |
...
3.3.1 IdPe Server Configuration
Hardware | O/S | Other TBD |
Virtual Machine | RHEL3 TBD |
|
This information is an assumption and will be updated when MIT specifies what their production server configuration will be.
3.3.2 IdPi Server Configuration
Hardware | O/S | Other |
Dell TBD | RHEL3 |
|
This information is an assumption and will be updated when MIT specifies what their production server configuration will be.
...
Hardware | O/S | Other |
PC | Windows XP Professional SP 2 |
|
Macintosh PowerPC | Mac OS X |
|
Mobile Platforms | TBD | TBD |
This information is an assumption and will be updated when MIT specifies what their desired client configuration will be for the purposes of this testing phase.
...
Key Deliverables | Description | Expected Delivery Date | Resource |
Test Plan | This document. | After all needed data is delivered (first half March 08) | Questcon |
Test Case Designs | List of objectives and priorities of the tests. | 4 business days after test plan is approved and necessary information and environmental needs met. | Questcon or MIT designated resource |
Test Cases | Steps and expected results. | 6 business days after test case design completeion. | Questcon or MIT designated resource |
Status Reports | Accomplishments, issues and plans. | Weekly | Questcon or MIT designated resource |
Test Logs | Test execution data that indicates test run status, number of test runs and test metrics summaries. | Ongoing during test execution | Questcon or MIT designated resource |
Defect Reports | Entered in Jira as they are discovered. | Ongoing during test execution | Questcon or MIT designated resource |
Test Summary Report | Details the results of the testing effort. | 2 business days after test execution is completed. | Questcon or MIT designated resource |
...
The planned test schedule of the Touchstone project does not has an anticipated start date or completion date set yet. All dates are subject to several assumptions, some of which have been identified in 2.3 Risks & Contingencies.
Information below is null and void, working with new Questcon contractor to revise and update the schedule during the first week of March 08.
Milestone | Target Timeframe | Summation of Activities |
Develop test strategy / plan | 01/15/2008 - 02/05/2008 |
|
Review test plan | 02/05/2008 - 02/11/2008 |
|
Perform test analysis | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Review test case design | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Build functional test cases / scenarios | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Setup test environment | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Setup test data | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Execute functional & exploratory tests | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Investigate / correct defects | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Execute regression tests | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Execute UAT | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Create test summary | //2008 - //2008 |
|
Total: | 65 business days | _ ** This estimate could change depending on the actual number of test cases, complexity of test cases, or items we are not aware of at this time._ |