Comment:
Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
Excerpt
hidden
true
Analyzing a continuous momentum flux (falling water).
...
id
probdeck
...
A
...
railroad
...
car
...
that
...
is
...
open
...
on
...
the
...
top
...
is
...
rolling
...
freely
...
(without
...
friction)
...
along
...
a
...
straight,
...
level
...
section
...
of
...
track
...
when
...
it
...
begins
...
to
...
rain
...
heavily
...
at
...
a
...
steady
...
rate.
...
The
...
rain
...
collects
...
in
...
the
...
car
...
at
...
a
...
rate
...
of
...
1.0
...
cm
...
per
...
minute.
...
The
...
dimensions
...
of
...
the
...
car
...
are
...
10.0
...
m
...
long
...
by
...
3.0
...
m
...
wide
...
and
...
the
...
mass
...
of
...
the
...
(empty)
...
car
...
is
...
1200
...
kg.
Composition Setup
Deck of Cards
id
probdeck
Card
label
Part A
Part A
If the car was initially moving at a rate of 2.5 m/s and the rain is falling straight down, what is the speed of the car 2.0 minutes after the rain has begun?
Solution
Toggle Cloak
id
sysa
System:
Cloak
id
sysa
Train car as a plus the rain collected in 2.0 minutes as a .
Toggle Cloak
id
inta
Interactions:
Cloak
id
inta
We will ignore the vertical direction, so there are no relevant external forces (gravity and the normal force each provide no x-component).
The y direction can be neglected here because the normal force of the ground guarantees that the train car will not accelerate in the y direction. One advantage of the vector nature of momentum is that even though the y-momentum of our system is clearly not conserved, the x-momentum is conserved.
Toggle Cloak
id
moda
Model:
Cloak
id
moda
.
Toggle Cloak
id
appa
Approach:
Cloak
id
appa
Toggle Cloak
id
diaga
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diaga
As remarked above, because the rain has only a y-velocity initially, we can treat the process of collecting the rain as a typical collision in the x-direction, with momentum conserved. Thus, we can effectively diagram the situation as shown below.
Image Added
Cloak
diaga
diaga
Toggle Cloak
id
matha
Mathematical Representation
Cloak
id
matha
Since there is no friction and the track is level, any change in the speed of the car must be due to the rain. By including the rain in our system, we have ensured that all x-forces are internal. Thus, the x-momentum must be a constant. We can therefore write:
If the car was initially moving at a rate of 2.5 m/s and the rain is falling straight down, what is the speed of the car 2.0 minutes after the rain has begun?
h4. Solution
{toggle-cloak:id=sysa} *System:* {cloak:id=sysa}Train car as a [point particle] plus the rain collected in 2.0 minutes as a [point particle]. {cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=inta} *Interactions:* {cloak:id=inta}We will *ignore the vertical direction*, so there are no *relevant* external forces (gravity and the normal force each provide no x-component).
{note}The _y_ direction can be neglected here because the normal force of the ground guarantees that the train car will not accelerate in the _y_ direction. One advantage of the vector nature of momentum is that even though the y-momentum of our system is clearly not conserved, the x-momentum _is_ conserved.{note} {cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=moda} *Model:* {cloak:id=moda}[Momentum and External Force].{cloak}
{toggle-cloak:id=appa} *Approach:*
{cloak:id=appa}
{toggle-cloak:id=diaga} {color:red} *Diagrammatic Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=diaga}
As remarked above, because the rain has only a y-velocity initially, we can treat the process of collecting the rain as a typical collision in the x-direction, with momentum conserved. Thus, we can effectively diagram the situation as shown below.
!TrainRain.jpg|height=300!
{cloak:diaga}
{toggle-cloak:id=matha} {color:red} *Mathematical Representation* {color}
{cloak:id=matha}
Since there is no friction and the track is level, any change in the speed of the car must be due to the rain. By including the rain in our system, we have ensured that all x-forces are internal. Thus, the x-momentum must be a constant. We can therefore write:
{latex}
{latex}
{note}It might be confusing that we can treat the rain, which falls individually as drops, as if it were one solid object. The reason we can get away with this is the assumption that all the rain drops fall with exactly the same x-momentum, and that they end up at rest with respect to the car. Because all the drops experience the same momentum change we can simply group them together and consider the momentum of the "rain block".{note}
All that remains is to determine the mass of the rain. We can do this by noting that the density of water is 1000 kg/m{color:black}^3^{color} and that the water has filled the car to 2.0 cm deep, indicating a collected mass of:
{latex}
Note
It might be confusing that we can treat the rain, which falls individually as drops, as if it were one solid object. The reason we can get away with this is the assumption that all the rain drops fall with exactly the same x-momentum, and that they end up at rest with respect to the car. Because all the drops experience the same momentum change we can simply group them together and consider the momentum of the "rain block".
All that remains is to determine the mass of the rain. We can do this by noting that the density of water is 1000 kg/m3 and that the water has filled the car to 2.0 cm deep, indicating a collected mass of:
h4. Solution
*System:* The rain entering the car in a time _t_, treated as a [point particle].
*Interactions:* External forces from gravity and from the railroad car. We assume the collision force is much larger than the force of gravity during the collision.
*Model:* [Momentum and External Force].
*Approach:* {note} Note that we have chosen to model the water, even though we are asked for the force from the water on the car. During the collision, the collision forces on the water dominate and so we can solve for them. The collision forces on the car, however, are not dominant. The y-component of the collision force is completely balanced by the normal force. For this reason it is hard to solve for the force using the car's dynamics. Instead, we will use [Newton's 3rd Law|Newton's Third Law] to relate the collision force on the rain to the force from the rain on the car.{note}
We will make the approximation that enough raindrops are hitting the car that the rain can essentially be treated as a continuous flow of water. The force that acts on the water is equal to the time derivative of its momentum. Because of the discontinuous nature of the impact (the rain is assumed to stop instantaneously) it is impossible to express the rain's momentum as a continuous function of time. For this reason, we must re-express the law of interaction:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ F_{x} = \frac{dp_{x}}{dt} = \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{p_{x}(t) - p_{x}(0)}{t} = \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{m^{\rm rain}(t)v^{\rm car} - m^{\rm rain}(t)(\mbox{0 m/s})}{t}\]
\[F_{y} = \frac{dp_{y}}{dt} = \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{p_{y}(t) - p_{x}(0)}{t} = \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{m^{\rm rain}(t)(\mbox{0 m/s}) + m^{\rm rain}(t)v^{\rm rain}}{t}\]\end{large}{latex}
{note}Note that the rain is falling downward, which we have chosen to be the negative _y_ direction.{note}
The mass of rain that enters the car in a time _t_ can be expressed in terms of the rate at which the rain accumulates in the car, known to be:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ r = \frac{\mbox{1.0 cm}}{\mbox{1.0 min}} = \frac{\mbox{0.01 m}}{\mbox{60 s}} = \mbox{0.00017 m/s} \]\end{large}{latex}
{warning}Because rain falls in drops, not as a continuous sheet, the rate of height accumulation is *not* the same as the rain's speed through the air!{warning}
In terms of this rate _r_, we can write:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ m^{\rm rain}(t) = \rho^{\rm water}rlwt \]\end{large}{latex}
where _l_ and _w_ are the length and width of the train car.
We now have:
{latex}\begin{large}\[ F_{x} = \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{\rho^{\rm water}rlwtv^{\rm car}}{t} = \rho^{\rm water}rlwv^{\rm car} = 12.5 N \]
\[ F_{y} = \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{\rho^{\rm water}rlwtv^{\rm rain}}{t} = \rho^{\rm water}rlwv^{\rm rain} = 50 N \]\end{large}{latex}
{tip}Both components should be positive, since the rain is _acquiring a positive_ x-velocity and _losing a negative_ y-velocity.{tip}
The total force on the rain is therefore:
{latex}\begin{large} \[ F^{\rm rain} = \mbox{12.5 N}\hat{x} + \mbox{50 N}\hat{y} = \mbox{52 N at 76}^{\circ}\mbox{ counterclockwise from the +x axis}\]\end{large}{latex}
Thus, the force on the _car_ is 52 N at 256° counterclockwise from the +x axis.
...
Image Removed
...
Solution
Toggle Cloak
id
sysb
System:
Cloak
id
sysb
The rain entering the car in a time t, treated as a .
Toggle Cloak
id
intb
Interactions:
Cloak
id
intb
External forces from gravity and from the railroad car. We assume the collision force is much larger than the force of gravity during the collision.