Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

GR1 -

...

Task Analysis

Stephen Chang, Sarah Han, Samvaran Sharma

...

Listed below are three different types of people who might use BrackeTracker.  We interviewed three people, each representing one of our three different personas:

  • the The Manager
    • The manager had run has coordinated a variety of tournaments, both small scale and medium scale tournaments (~10 participants and ~35 participants respectively).  He is most experienced in running small tournaments, being the go-to guy with his friends for setting up brackets for tournaments that take only a few hours to complete.  He has run a handful of medium sized tournaments for larger groups, but is by no means an expert.  In the medium sized tournament, the hardest aspect of managing and running the tournament was figuring out the tournament structure and generating the matches.  With that many teams, there were many different possible tournament styles: single elimination, double elimination, round-robin, etc.  Because of the unusual conditions of the tournament, three-player matches (1v1v1) instead of two-player matches (1v1), he decided that the simplest, yet still fair, tournament structure was a round-robin tournament with one player having a bye to the second round.  At each stage of the tournament he had to manually generate the next set of round robin matches.  The small scale tournament was a simpler, single-elimination bracket.  This smaller tournament was much more well defined and as a result much easier to maintain.  Using a simple whiteboard, players would just write down the winner of each match after it was played.  
    • Lessons Learned: 
      • Generation of a bracket is often difficult without prior knowledge
      • Tedious to have to generate all next set of rounds for large numbers of participants (especially in round robin tournaments)
      • Updating winners/scores easy under certain conditions (small scale tournament with few participants and on a small time scale)
      • Running a longer tournament single-handed takes a lot of time
      • Different set of difficulties in running small and large tournaments.
  • The Player
    • the Challenger
    • Manager/Challenger
    • for people who know how to use a computer and want a quick solution for creating a tournament
    • for people of all ages
    • need little-no previous experience
    •  
      • The player is always up for a tournament among friends.  Whether it is ping-pong or pool, the player is ready to show off his skills and hopes to end up the winner.  He travels in different circles, spending his free time between his co-workers, college friends, and dance buddies, which sometimes results in participating in multiple tournaments at once.  He needs to keep track of his scores, report them to his friend in charge, and find out who his next opponent is, but this can get confusing at times.  Being a busy guy in multiple tournaments means having to remember multiple sets of scores and names all while trusting that his friend in charge will spot any score discrepancies and constantly update him on the tournament status.
      • Lessons Learned:
        • Needs a way to keep track of different tournaments
        • Wants to be able to easily view his record
        • Would rather not have to rely on word-of-mouth conversations, emails, and text-messages for updates (which sometimes get lost in his memory/inbox)
    • Manager/Player
      • The Manager/Player (so called because she typically both manages tournaments, as well as playing in them. These are typically smaller, more impromptu tournaments between friends. Usually she turns to Google Docs to keep track of the tournament, and although it works sufficiently well, it require more setup and maintenance than she'd like. For instance, she is now the point person for creating the Google Doc, inviting others to view the tournament, and prodding those falling behind in their scheduled games to get their games finished. Doing this again and again can get tiring, especially since this Manager/Player wants to play her games in a timely manner as well. 
      • Lessons Learned:
        • The Manager/Player would really love to have a largely automated solution that would require little extra effort on her part as the creator of the tournament
        • She's not looking for any amazingly advanced features, but rather a simple yet effective setup that doesn't require everyone to make new accounts and receive invites, and allows everyone to log in quickly.
        • Inviting people to games should be as simple as emailing or sharing a link or code to anyone you'd like to be in the tournament (ie. you don't need to know their Gmail addresses or be friends with them on Facebook)

    Our general demographic can be very varied. As such, the following broad user profile characteristics represent our potential Players, Managers, as well as Manager/Players:

    • Age, gender, culture, language:
      • The user base can span any age, gender, or culture. The website is mainly geared towards an English-speaking audience, but is not heavily dependent on large quantities of text, so non-English users will likely still be able to use the site without much hassle.
    • Education (literacy/ numeracy):
      • Does not require any significant advancement in literacy or numeracy.
    • Physical Limitations:
      • There are no special physical prerequisites - as long as the user can use a computer keyboard and mouse effectively, he or she should face no problems.
    • Computer Experience:
      • Must have basic proficiency with computers.
    • Motivation, Attitude:
      • People who are excited and motivated about the tournament at hand, and want the administrative work cut out!
    • Domain experience:
      • No previous tournament management experience needed per se; however, familiarity with basic tournament types (elimination, round robin, etc.) will allow you to set up the tournament faster.
    • Application experience:
      • No previous application experience necessary.
    • Work Environment:
      • This website is appropriate for almost any environment, from the workplace to a casual group of friends, to an extracurricular club, and more...
    • Relationships with others:
      • Since this sets up tournaments between friends, members need to be in email contact. However, other than a one-time email inviting people to the tournament, there are no other essential emails that need to be sent. Therefore, a tournament can be executed between people who are never in the same room (eg. if you were putting together an online chess tournament).

    Task analysis

    There are a few main tasks involved with the Bracketracker.  These tasks include:

    • Create a tournament
    • Update the a tournament
    • View your a tournament(s)Searching
    • Search for and Joining Join a tournament(s)
    • Manage a tournament

     

    Create a Tournament

    SearchingSearch for/Joining Join a Tournament

    Updating Update a Tournament

    Managing Manage a Tournament

    Viewing View a Tournament

    Goal
    & Subtasks

    To create a new tournament among friends & create a new bracket.

    To join an existing tournament.

    Updating To update the score after a match

    • Send score confirmation request to opponent
    • Confirm score request

    To ensure the tournament continues in a timely manner

    • Boot inactive players
    • Correct scores
    • Change tournament details

    To assess the state of the tournament:.

    • View leaderboard
    • View scoreboard
    • View current bracket
    • View notifications

    Preconditions

    Type of tournament

    Tournament name; If tournament in "joining" stage

    Tournament name; Player in tournament, which game/match; Score

    Desire change; Manager in tournament

    Tournament name; Player in tournament

    Location

    On website

    On website

    On website

    On website

    On website

    Frequency of Use

    Once per tournament

    Once per tournament

    Multiple times per day

    As many as needed; many times a day

    As many as needed; many times a day

    How Learned

    By doing or watching

    By doing or watching

    By doing or watching

    By doing or watching

    By doing or watching

    Possible Errors

    Non-Unique tournament name

    Wrong tournament name; Missed "joining" period

    Updating wrong game or score

    Updating wrong feature or game

    Being a dumbass Viewing wrong tournament

    Time Constraints

    None

    Within "joining" period

    Within scope of tournament

    Within the scope of tournament

    None

    Who Else Involved

    None

    None

    Opponent

    None

    None