...
- ITIL, Agile, and other theories all recommend strongly encouraging more frequent but smaller, simpler releases.
- Our process achieves that but does not set policy for what a "phase" is, which essentially breaks the process.
- A "phase" is only a phase if it can result, on its own, in a discrete improvement to the product or service.
- A project "phase" must end in a release; this is a "release unit." It is not just a discrete unit of work.
Decompositions
This is a significant simplification of some \ [ed. overly complicated\] industry scholarship. Wiki Markup
Type of Work Flow
Instead of the sizing metaphor, tiny/s/m/l/xl, this is one method of "cascading" change types that I found, worthy of discussion. This is an example and a simplification but shows some difference in ways of looking at a "decision guide" model in ways we have not.
...
- Head First PMP
- GDPA IT Project Types http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/gdpa/part3/p3t2.htm (About GDPA: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/gdpa/aboutgdpa.htm)
- Wikipedia Summary of Identifying and Managing Project Risk by Tom Kendrick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identifying_and_Managing_Project_Risk
- Klosterboer, Larry. "Chapter 3 - Defining Change and Release Management Processes". Implementing ITIL Change and Release Management. IBM Press. © 2009. Books24x7. <http://mv.ezproxy.com.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/book/id_30900/book.asp> (accessed July 28, 2010)
- The Visible Ops Handbook