Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

Design 2

This design is aimed at maximal search functionality. 

Image Added

HOME PAGE

Pros
* Informative page that let's first time users know what the site is about.

Cons
* Not very functional except for serving as a hub from which to navigate to other site pages.
* The Bootstrap layout is a bit overdone, but pretty.  

Image Added

GIVE PAGE

Pros
* The listings are very detailed. This makes searching and filtering very user friendly because different users may care about different aspects of the item (item category, item condition, etc).
* Users have the option to upload a group of items together as a collection instead of listing out each item's details individually. This improves efficiency for those with large donations. 
* Forms are a familiar user input medium. 

Cons
* Submitting an item is tedious as there are many fields that must be filled out for each item. This would make uploading many items for donating a chore if they were done individually. 
* Items uploaded as a group lose many of the attributes that make search and filter so powerful.

Image Added

RECEIVE PAGE

Pros
* Finding specific items is easy due to items having many attributes to filter on. 

Cons
* The submit or exchange option is not necessarily intuitive.

Image Added

EXCHANGE PAGE

Pros
* Layout is intuitive -- half of the page is the items the user is offering and the other half is the items that the user is requesting. 

Cons
* Listing items for offer suffers from the same shortcomings as the GIVE page

Image Removed

Some text about this.

Image Removed

Some text about this.

Image Removed

Some text about this.

Image Removed

Some text about this.