...
Issues | Users | Possible improvement | Severity |
---|---|---|---|
Could not post a tweet because | User 1 | Create independent data base for tweets. | Minor |
When navigating Google Earth, tried to use mouse | User 1 | Support mouse navigation alongside keyboard controls. | Minor |
Was confused when taken to teleport's navigation | User 1 | Make it more obvious that person's live chat window moves | Minor |
When tried to speak a location, there were multiple errors. | User 1 | Better speech parsing and understanding capabilities. | Minor |
Keyboard does not have Page Up / Page Down. | User 2 | Choose a different universal key. | Minor |
The tweet option appears only when the user clicks the | User 2 | Include a separate button for the tweet option. | Minor |
Audio distortion. The user had to refresh the browser to | User 2 | Most likely caused by internet connection. | Minor |
|
|
|
|
Reflection
- Brainstorming For our group, brainstorming and sketching ideas separately and then discussing them together as a group really expanded the amount of options and possible solutions we considered.
- Early We feel like early paper prototyping is a good way to figure was very helpful to us understand usability, efficiency and learnability issues.
- During user testing we observed plenty of user behaviours that we could not have predicted ourselves.
- Because We found that paper prototyping is quick and easy, it allows to iterate through many different design options. Paper prototyping particularly helped us to find the most intuitive location for buttons and navigation controls; find out safety issues (e.g. confirming that tweets are being saved); because the paper prototype was to scale we got a good indication if the layout works well.we used the same layout that we finalized in the paper-prototyping.
- We think, we didn't scope our project well -- this project was pretty complex, required some serious engineering and the implementation time we had (for computer prototyping) wasn't enough. We got pretty bad grade in GR4 but we believe that it was a good idea to focus on the individual pieces rather than the layout. We wanted to ensure that we have all the technology we need for building this system. Our computer prototype did't connect the individual pieces together and while the TA viewed it as an incomplete computer prototype, we think we took the right approach.
- We loved the class, and it definitely taught us how to approach building good user interfacesThe drawback of a paper prototype was that it did not allow us to foresee many implementation challenges, accurately test typography, colour schemes.