Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

What we would plan to address: 
We agreed with several of the usability problems that User 1 pointed out. In the next cycle of our iterative design process we would likely incorporate all of his feedback into the next version of the interface.

User 2:

Dr. X is a young radiologist who often works in ICU, and has very good IT skills.

General Feedback:

  • Wiki Markup

...

  • \[

...

  • Major\]

...

  •  In order to to assess patient Mohammad, the user wants to see the previous observations on the patient. This issue is inherent to the fact that we have narrowed the scope of our application.
  • Wiki Markup
    \[Minor\] The user dislike having to scroll down the right information box. The user would prefer that the application had some non-important information such as the patient's address, so that he can focuses on the most useful information.
  • Wiki Markup
    \[Feature request\] In the vital signal, it would be good to display the patient's temperature. As the temperature isn't taken regularly, it should go along with the time at which it has been taken.
  • Wiki Markup
    \[Minor\] The patient's photo is nice shouldn't appear by default as it is not frequently used.
  • Wiki Markup
    \[Major\] The user found a bit surprising that the application maintains two different list of medications: other medications vs. prescriptions. In the ICU, most patients are able to medicate themselves so it would probably makes more sense to add the other medications within the prescriptions.
  • Wiki Markup
    \[Major\] When adding a prescription, the physician has to indicate in which units the dosage is expressed. This could lead to dangerous typo (e.g. _g_ instead of _mg_).

Solution 1:

Wiki Markup
Usability Issue 2: \[Aesthetic\] 

...

User 3:

Wiki Markup
General Feedback:
Usability Issue 1: \[Critical\] 

...