Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Browse for easy classes (by type, CI-H, HASS A/S/H)
    • Integrated advanced search by variety of fields
      • Number of pages of required reading and writing
      • Hours of work each week
      • Time class meets
      • Number of class sessions each week
  • Submit reviews of classes → gain user credibility
    • Link credibility rating to user’s certificate.
    • Enable hashtags for fast searching
  • Give overall ratings (classes could be worth taking even if they aren’t easy)
    • One unified “central opinion” based on post ranking.
    • Submission form for 1-sentence opinions.

TA Feedback.

As we discussed in our meeting, this project in this submission is not a stretch at all. Make sure you focus on something that's not just for MIT students, and that isn't just a layer over a database.

Your user analysis starts with demographics, which is kind of a backwards way of thinking about users, as we discussed in the meeting. However, it's commendable that you broke up your analysis of users by role, rather than just by characteristics.

Besides thinking about your users more holistically, and as people who have problems you're trying to solve, please also flesh out your tasks. There's very little information there, and you'll be working off this document for the whole rest of the project, so it's important to have this in writing.

A few smaller changes: try to make your group wiki less informal, please also change your group name to something consistent with the project.

I'd appreciate it if you made these changes, since we'll be working off this document for the whole rest of the project.