Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
OIS Services -- Email, Network

% Uptime

FY08 Q2

FY08 Q3

FY08 Q4

FY09 Q1

FY09 Q2

FY09 Q3

FY09 Q4

FY10 Q1

FY10 Q2

FY10 Q3

Wikis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99.6

99.6

99.9

Stellar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99.7

99.4

99.6

Data Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98

99.9

99.9

ISDA Services -- Wikis, Stellar, Data Warehouse

% Uptime 

FY08 Q2

FY08 Q3

FY08 Q4

FY09 Q1

FY09 Q2

FY09 Q3

FY09 Q4

FY10 Q1

FY10 Q2

FY10 Q3

Wikis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99.6

99.6

99.9 

Stellar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99.7

99.4

99.6 

Data Warehouse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98

 

99.9

99.9 

Here is text from Pat Sheppard that goes into wonderful detail about deriving the measures.

Code Block


Wikis: analyzed FY10 Q1 - Q3 for wikis production hosts (asterope/vega and confab), and counted anything that would result in unavailability from the user perspective (so either of database or web server, but not things like high swap utilization or NTP).
Q1:
Total: 7 hours, 41 minutes downtime (3 hours was during scheduled vega \-> asterope cutover)
Assume 2160 hours in one quarter (30 * 3 * 24) = 99.6% uptime.
Q2:
Total 7 hours, 45 minutes (1 hour 15 minutes confab migration to OC11, 6.5 hours for asterope hardware issue)
Assume 2160 hours in one quarter (30 * 3 * 24) = 99.6% uptime.
Q3:
Total 1 hour = 99.9% uptime.
Stellar: application metrics for Nagios.
FY10 Q1:
7 hours downtime = 99.7% uptime.
FY10 Q2:
12 hours downtime = 99.4% uptime.
FY10 Q3:
7.5 hours total (4.5 for move to OC11) = 99.6% uptime
Data Warehouse:
FY10 Q1:
Total 44 hours = 98% uptime.
FY10 Q2:
3 hours downtime = 99.9% uptime.
FY10 Q3:
3 hours downtime = 99.9% uptime.