...
- result of analysis of SL09b production
- Jan (Drupal blog )
- presentation of W-algo ver 4.0 using BTOW & TPC, for 1M input events
- Run 9 results as of September 1 Slides
- histogram-based dump of selected events
- Larger collections of events: di-jets , W-candidates , Z-candidates
- Matt's 3 interactive events in skechup or just one view , at Scott's angle
- sequential histograms from pass through 1M events (LT=~8/pb)
- M-C simulation analysis histograms for Pythia W-events (LT=320/pb) , filtered QCD-events LT=6.3/pb, Z-events LT=4200/pb
- Suggestions: count # of track pointing to cluster; compare ET vs. PT for electron
- Joe adopted his algo developed on M-C to work with Run 9 data
- * removed BSMD, changed to tower-based center of gravity, relaxed cuts: PT>5 GeV/c, delEta & delPhi<0.5, isoFraction of 0.8
- Uber-preliminary result for 1M input events showing W peak and a hint of a Z peak plots
- Jan (Drupal blog )
- Run 9 data publication strategy has been discussed and in general agreed up. Use of BSMD for PRL paper 1 was discussed - it is worth trying. Effici
- Questions/comments
- from former prominent STAR collaborator:
- Could the Z-candidates be di-jets? cosmic rays? Do you try to do any charge sign discrimination on the electrons (i.e., opposite sign on the 2 sides for "Z-candidates")? Phi distribution does not appear indicative of cosmics.
- Most importantly, is "Jacobian peak" absent when you look at 200 GeV data with the same algo and cuts?
- Lots of questions, but this does look really promising, seems to give you NN W candidates NN Z candidates in the barrel region. It's a bit surprising that such a crude isolation cut, with no away-side ET upper threshold or SMD criterion, would suppress jet background so effectively. We always thought we would have to work much harder than this to unveil a signal above background.
- Jan: Mike B. just confirmed we could Lets plan to use BFC filter to get rid of not-BHT3 events from pp200 data. This makes another mini-production request of pp200 data a viable option (there is a small issue thou).. Process LT~10/pb. Needs: adopted filtering code, run selection, 1mm accuracy of TPC calibration (within month), supported production request
- Joe: estimate TPC tracking efficiency difference for e+ vs. e-
- from former prominent STAR collaborator:
- Ross - vernier scan analysis
- lots of detail about how I do the fit - Ross is looking for explanation why his calculations are off by ~4 orders of magnitude. knows
- Comparison of Vernier scan from 2 pp500 runs - background visible in both
- Comments/suggestions:
- post study with eliminated TP affected the most by the beam background
- post input data from Angelika
- exercise the code on mock data to verify it reconstructs width correctly
- Joe - BTOW relative gains, not yet
- new phone meeting time moved to : Tuesday 5-6 pm EDT
- low TPC tracking efficiency at eta~0. How can we address this issue?
Below is suggestion from Jerome. In short he offers a welcome at BNL.- The convoluted hit issue brought during Jan's presentation: Yuri will show Jan how to access/recognize those. It was generally understood that using those in tracking would require
- a study of effect in real data
- a response simulator simulating those convoluted hits so embedding would be properly handled (right, it is not handled in embedding not tracking so goes into a reco inefficiency).
- We welcome Jan coming at BNL and working with Yuri on characterizing the effect on tracking. A month work would bring a pretty good study (still the embedding is questionably achievable within the workload and timeframe)
- The convoluted hit issue brought during Jan's presentation: Yuri will show Jan how to access/recognize those. It was generally understood that using those in tracking would require
August 27, 2009
Present: Willie, Matt, Jan, Hal, Rosi, Justin
Minutes
...