Comment:
Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
Excerpt
hidden
true
Changes in Angular Velocity when the Moment of Inertia is changed, but no torque applied.
Composition Setup
Yun Yea-Ji (KOR) at the 2009 South Korean Figure Skating Championships Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons
Consider an ice skater performing a spin. The ice is very nearly a frictionless surface
A skater spinning around has constant angular momentum, but can change his or her Moment of Inertia by changing body position. What happens to their rate of rotation when they do so?
Deck of Cards
id
bigdeck
Card
label
Part A
Part A
Assume that the skater originally is standing straight up while spinning, with arms extended. He or she then draws his or her arms inwards tightly to the sides. How does the angular velocity change?
Solution
Toggle Cloak
id
sysa1
System:
Cloak
id
sysa1
The skater is treated as a in two configurations – one with the arms extended, the other with arms held close.
Toggle Cloak
id
inta1
Interactions:
Cloak
id
inta1
External influences – none. The skater is moving on a frictionless surface.
Toggle Cloak
id
moda1
Model:
Cloak
id
moda1
Toggle Cloak
id
appa1
Approach:
Cloak
id
appa1
Toggle Cloak
id
diaga1
Diagrammatic Representation
Cloak
id
diaga1
Consider the skater intially as a massless vertical pole with the arms modeled as massless rods of length Li with a point mass m at each end.
After contracting the skater's arms, the two masses are each a distance Lf from the body
After drawing in his or her arms, the skater is spinning much more rapidly, without the application of any external forces or torques.
Cloak
matha1
matha1
Cloak
appa1
appa1
Card
Part A
Part A
Card
label
Part B
Part B
Solution
What if we address this from the standpoint of Energy? If the Energy is conserved (since there is no external work done on the system), then we ought to be able to derive the angular velocity from Conservation of Energy.
Warning
This assumption really is not correct – Energy is NOT conserved in this case, despite the absence of outside forces. But we'll proceed to see where this assuimption leads.
From our expressions for Rotational Energy, we know that the energy is given by
Clearly there is an error, since this does not agree with our previous result.
The error is the assumption that energy is conserved. In drawing his or her arms inwards, the skater must exert force to bring them closer tto the axis and rotate faster. This force acting over a distance performs work and increases the system energy. The change in energy is given by the difference between the above expressions
Latex
\begin{large}\[\Delta E = E_{\rm f} - E_{\rm i} \]\end{large}
Substituting in from the equations in Part A, one finds, after a little algebra:
Latex
\begin{large}\[\Delta E = E_{\rm i}(\frac{I_{\rm i}}{I_{\rm f}} - 1) \]\end{large}
If it is not clear how the Kinetic Energy can change within a closed system with no external torques or forces, see the example Rotating a Space Ship