Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Help faculty understand their needs
    1. Services available
    2. Price point
    3. Colleague's needs
      • Focus groups
  2. Push vs pull
    • Get in circle of trust
      1. students
      2. colleagues
      3. admins
      4. departmental support
  3. Structure for assessment
    1. communicating with each other
    2. evaluating
    3. translation into agile, responsive services
    4. surveys
    5. are the services currently in place working?

...

    1. Image Added

Facilitate:

  • Scope
    • Completely new vs. solutions that exist (in part)
  • Video
    • Graduation <-> Retrospectives
    • Choke point?
    • Tracking resources - know where to go
    • Needs gathering vs. Answering questions

...

  1. ACCORD: Clearing house, comprehensive index
    1. Sustained
    2. Moderated
    3. Collect from providers
  2. Rejuvenate EdTech Partners
    1. Affinity groups
    2. Institute mandate/support
  3. Edit and upgrade Teaching with Technology page
    • searchable
  4. Address core areas of confusion
    1. Video delivery and production
    2. Classroom ownership and management
    3. Course management
    4. Content repositories
    5. Affinity groups

Figure 2a

Figure 2b

    1. Image AddedImage Added

Communicate:

  • With the end user and with departments/people who service the end user
  • Power of the liaison programs
    • OCW and Libraries and (who else?)
    • Coordinate among liaison groups
  • Amongst ourselves
  • Easy, obvious, and visual
  • Sustain groups like EdTech partners
    • Someone in ACCORD to be accountable?

...

  1. Capture ideas, synthesize, communicate back to today's workshop attendees and on ACCORD web site
  2. Recommend next steps -> "Top 3" actions
  3. Moira list (question)( ? )
  4. Provide more granular list of activites
  5. Resurrect EdTech partners
  6. Roadmap
    • Compile and distribute
    • Work and people
  7. Departmental people