Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration, Fisheries Statistics Division (2007). By the Numbers: Saltwater Fishing Facts for 2006. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/PartnershipsCommunications/recfish/BytheNumbers2006.pdf.

 Flag Hopping and Fishing Under Flags of Conveinence

A major problem facing the enforcement of international fishing regulations is the issue of flag hopping and fishing under flags of convenience.  The phenomenon is a direct result of many countries opening their fishing registries to fishing companies of other nationalities. By allowing this, countries can increase the revenue that they gain from fishing, and this has made the idea of open registry very popular in poorer countries such as Panama and Bolivia.  All of this sounds fine, when the country allowing open registry follows international protocol.  However, the reason flag hopping is so detrimental to international fishing regulations is that many countries where open registry is popular, do not abide by international fishing laws nor do they sign on to international treaties.  This means that fishing companies that register under the flag of these countries no longer have to abide by these laws either.  They can go into marine reserves and fish, they can fish as much as they want to and with no fear of repercussion, and if they country decides that they wish to comply with international regulations then the fishing company can simply switch flags in order to continue fishing outside of regulations, hence the term flag hopping.  Boats can switch flags without ever docking in the port of the country that they wish to switch to.  This phenomenon creates a tremendous loophole in the enforcement of international fishing regulations and negatively curbs the effects of fishing regulations  

Main Source: "Fishing Under Flags of Convenience: Using Market Power to Increase Compliance with International Regulations"  Elizabeth R. Desombre.   Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005

Whaling

Trading Regulations

...

Wiki Markup
The International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) is a scientific organization based in Copenhagen, Denmark.  ICES "coordinates and promotes marine research in the North Atlantic"\[1\]  with the help and expertise of more than 1600 scientists from its twenty member countries.\[2\]   ICES uses its research to create cohesive marine management plans for its members.

...

Wiki Markup
The ICES vision is to develop "an international scientific community that is relevant, responsive, sound, and credible concerning marine ecosystems and their relation to humanity."  The organization hopes to achieve the vision by advancing "the scientific capacity to give advice on human activities affecting, and affected by, marine ecosystems."  \[3\]  Specifically, ICES has defined ten major goals in its Strategic Plan:\[4\]Understand the physical, chemical, and biological functioning of marine ecosystems;

...


Understand and quantify human impacts on marine ecosystems, including living marine resources;

...


Evaluate options for sustainable marine-related industries, particularly fishing and mariculture;

...


Advise on the sustainable use of living marine resources and protection of the marine environment;

...


Enhance collaboration with organizations, scientific programs, and stake-holders (including the fishing industry) that are relevant to the ICES goals;

...


Maintain and further develop a modern and effective infrastructure to support ICES programs;

...


Keep abreast of the needs and expectations of ICES Member Countries;

...


Broaden the diversity of the scientists who participate in ICES activities;

...


Match the budget of ICES to the needs and expectations for scientific information and advice;

...


Make the scientific products of ICES more accessible to the public.

...

Wiki Markup

ICES has defined three major steps to implement these goals: create specific action plans that "relate activities and costs to the Strategic Plan,"\[5\]  monitor the success of its Strategic Plan and update the Plan as necessary.

...

Wiki Markup
The three Advisory Committees oversee the work of all of ICES's scientific and working groups.\[6\]   The Advisory Committees, on fishery management, marine environment, and ecosystem management, each work to support one of the three major components of ICES advice.

...

Wiki Markup
The biggest benefit that ICES provides to the world of marine management is its advice service.  ICES primarily gives advice in response to requests by member nations, but it may issue unsolicited advice if it feels the need.\[7\]   ICES has historically given advice based on single or mixed stock population and mortality targets, but is now beginning to introduce a comprehensive, ecosystem based approach to its advice.\[8\]

Wiki Markup
An ICES advice report is given for a specific region of the ocean that has unique ecological and social characteristics.  These regions are referred to as "ecoregions" by ICES.\[9\]   Each ecoregion report contains an overview section, a report on human impacts on the region, and an assessment of ecological trends in the region and advice based upon those trends.

Wiki Markup
All ICES advice starts with analysis of single and mixed stock statistics (most notably fishing mortality and spawning stock biomass).  The analysis combines publicly available catch data with ICES estimates for Unaccounted Fishing Mortality (UFM) to create estimates for the stocks fishing mortality rate.  ICES uses historical records to develop critical limits on the spawning stock biomass; outside these limits the stock is considered to have "reduced reproductive capability."\[10\]   The stock is then classified on its reproductive capacity and sustainability (which ICES uses to mean ability to withstand a population crash at status quo fishing intensity).\[11\]   These stock parameters are also used to create boundaries on fishing mortality rates and spawning stock biomass values for use in management plans.

Wiki Markup
ICES continues by analyzing the effectiveness of different management plans for their ability to improve the health of the stock and their compliance with any international or national agreements to which the ecoregion may be subject.  In general, plans are considered acceptable if they show that there is very little (less than 5%) chance that the plan will result in a spawning stock biomass less than the already defined critical level.\[12\]

...

Wiki Markup
+Works Cited+
\[1\]   "About us - What do we do?," [http://www.ices.dk/aboutus/aboutus.asp] (accessed November 15, 2007)
\[2\]  Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America are members of ICES.  Australia, Chile, Greece, New Zealand, Peru, and South Africa are affiliate countries.
\[3\]  The ICES Strategic Plan (Copenhagen, DK: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, 2002), [http://www.ices.dk/iceswork/strategic%20plan-final.pdf] (accessed November 15, 2007).
\[4\]  Ibid.
\[5\]  Ibid.
\[6\]  "About us - ICES Structure," [http://www.ices.dk/aboutus/structure.asp] (accessed November 15, 2007).
\[7\]  Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems, 2006.
\[8\]  Ibid.
\[9\]  Ibid.
\[10\]  Ibid.
\[11\]  Ibid.
\[12\]  Ibid.