Description:
In this experiment, we want to want to compare the levels of endogenous cofilin and TEVp-Cofilin expressed under an inducible promoter with different levels of dox induction. This will allow us to determine what level of expression of cofilin would lead to the best signal:noise ratio of exogenous cofilin to endogenous cofilin. We are planning to transfect HEK293 with TEVp-Cofilin under a TRE promoter and induce with varying levels of dox. We will then preform a Western blot with an anti-cofilin primary antibody and compare band sizes to test for the relative amounts of endogenous cofilin and exogenous TEVp-Cofilin in the cells.
Results:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Odyssey blocked blot. Cofilin and TEVp-Cofilin bands are not there... We know that cofilin is present in relatively large amounts and the fact that neither native cofilin nor TEVp-cofilin bands appear might indicate that there is a problem with the anitbody or the antibody treatment of the blot. Both anti-cofilin and anti-eYFP are rabbit antibodies and since eYFP bands show, we can assume that the goat anti-rabbit secondary works. YFP and GAPDH bands are higher than they should be. Low signal from GAPDH (relative to YFP) | BSA blocked blot. Cofilin and TEVp-Cofilin are not here either There's a lot of background |